Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > American Cars

American Cars Area dedicated to American Cars from Classic, Muscle, to Modern!



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2006, 02:11 PM   #16
racer_f50
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,537
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Hmmm... another American, I mean German, Bentley?
Indeed.

Would've been nicer if they had original styling ideas, instead of ripping off the Bently Continental GT's rear and parts of its front styling.

I thought the 300C was pretty mobster-like, so those looks could've been perfect for a car like this.
racer_f50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 02:56 PM   #17
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

and I thoughjt the 300C looked enough like an RR/Bently
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2006, 06:56 PM   #18
stracing
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,901
Default

another tool to up the wank factor!
__________________
Two rules for life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
stracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2006, 07:04 PM   #19
racer_f50
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,537
Default

Seems Ford is losing touch with why pickups were invented in the first place....

The truck bed itself looks pretty small compared with useful ones (Ram 2500, etc...).

The exterior and interior are both vomit-inducing, if you ask me. I guarantee I will throw up if I saw one of these driving around.

And about that interior...who the fuck buys a truck to have good rear passenger space? I know that's been a trend recently, and maybe it's useful for farmers who can't afford more than one vehicle, but shit....if you want foot rests for the people in the rear you're probably not a farmer. And even if you were, you'd want more space in the truck bed.
racer_f50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2006, 07:06 PM   #20
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

OMG, this truck is Hawt! (well, the dash is way too over-the-top)

not in those colors... it is, afterall a truck.

and people outside america just dont get trucks i guess

me-likey this driving brick

And about that interior...who the fuck buys a truck to have good rear passenger space? I know that's been a trend recently, and maybe it's useful for farmers who can't afford more than one vehicle, but shit....if you want foot rests for the people in the rear you're probably not a farmer. And even if you were, you'd want more space in the truck bed.
there are many reasons to have such a huge interior + a huge flatbed+ massive towing capacity...

ovbiously, you've never been to the home-depot, or worked anything construction related

and why are farmers always viewed as poor? they have 100x more motorized machinery then you'll prolly ever drive you know combines arent cheap
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2006, 05:25 AM   #21
AlienDB7
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,914
Default

Did Chrysler outsource the design and development for the Imperial to China? It looks more like another painful attempt by the Chinese in copying someone else's design

Having said that, it actually does look rather nice... until you get to the rear anyway. What's with all the clear taillights these days, they're just ugly IMO.
AlienDB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2006, 12:23 PM   #22
paradizzy
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 157
Default

ugly... why did they do this?
That mony what they put in this car could invest more clever way.
paradizzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2006, 01:15 PM   #23
MIHALS
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Behind the Wheel
Posts: 2,990
Default

ugly piece of crap

like dani said, is this some kind of off road?
the back looks awfull aswell...
__________________
MIHALS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2006, 07:43 AM   #24
dingo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
American style... the bigger the better
the bigger the better, except when it comes to the size of your penis when you drive one of these things. :roll:
__________________
dingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2006, 10:39 AM   #25
TransAm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 2,766
Default

Originally Posted by insane
Not fond of it really. Seems like they are trying to do a stylish interiours. So they took European ones as an example and thought "We'll they use wook, so that's what we'll need as well..." only they've gone a bit too far.
Don't let Chewbacca hear you say that
__________________
Current: 2008 BMW 118d SE, 2002 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda CBR600RR

Previous: 2003 Z4 3.0i SMG, 1995 Aprilia RS250
TransAm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2006, 10:43 AM   #26
Shinigami
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 955
Default

It won't fit on European roads, so I hope they won't try to bring it here.

Waste of space, must be heavy as king kong.
__________________
My new car: MB SLK55 AMG (36months, 40,000miles and still flawless)
My old car: MB SLK230K Brabus - sold
Shinigami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2006, 11:20 AM   #27
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by Shinri_Shiogami
It won't fit on European roads, so I hope they won't try to bring it here.

Waste of space, must be heavy as king kong.
its a concept.... never intended for production

oh, and as far as width, its not any wider then a H2... but definately longer
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2006, 11:24 AM   #28
DeMoN
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
Default

oh boy that is one hellofa crap car!
__________________
Guess who's Back!
DeMoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2006, 04:02 PM   #29
1zippo1
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,668
Default

Originally Posted by insane
Not fond of it really. Seems like they are trying to do a stylish interiours. So they took European ones as an example and thought "We'll they use wook, so that's what we'll need as well..." only they've gone a bit too far.
same thougths here, and the wood they've used is weird somehow.

This would look fit in a Terminator 4 movie, but as a real car, it's completly and utterly useless
1zippo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2006, 11:16 PM   #30
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by 1zippo1
Originally Posted by insane
Not fond of it really. Seems like they are trying to do a stylish interiours. So they took European ones as an example and thought "We'll they use wook, so that's what we'll need as well..." only they've gone a bit too far.
same thougths here, and the wood they've used is weird somehow.

This would look fit in a Terminator 4 movie, but as a real car, it's completly and utterly useless
except the fact that trucks are 1000x more usefullthen any car

why do you think trucks sell sooooo much better then any car?... vans may be the meathod out there...but trucks can do everyting +more then any van.
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump