03-31-2005, 11:55 PM
|
#31
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 416
|
|
Originally Posted by Wutputt
|
i like this one, look familar?  whats the engine/specs? Any interiror shots?
|
|
|
|
04-01-2005, 06:39 PM
|
#32
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 709
|
here is a new pics of the car from edmunds.com, i would have uploaded it to imageshack but my computer is giving me flack. so here is the link.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ne.promo.4.*#3
__________________
|
What good is Gas Mileage without Horsepower? That's why I bought a Saturn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2005, 04:23 AM
|
#33
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 179
|
dont like it one bit, but usually the final product doesnt look the exact same
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2005, 06:49 AM
|
#34
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 36
|
They forget to put Hyundai badge on it, that will be the best move to make it look really good. The G-Class in its current form can not be redesigned like this. It is great classic and people are buying it for that reason. I love the G55 AMG, best off-roader available. This is just looking so ugly as Porsche Cayenne.
__________________
"Our life has no sence, if we can't make things better, than our fathers."
Henry Ford
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2005, 06:52 PM
|
#35
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,337
|
Meh, in Ukraine national security drove G-wagons, I dont see them in this...
The G-wagon was the perfect car for blokes with shaved heads and MP5s.
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2005, 07:35 PM
|
#36
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
|
Lame.
...but all of you of you knew that already.
|
|
|
|
|
07-26-2005, 07:50 PM
|
#37
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
That is simply wrong!!!!! They have ruin a great heritage.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2005, 11:36 AM
|
#38
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 36
|
I still see some speculations, that this is not the new G-Class, but larger version of M-Class. If this is really not the new G-Class, then I bet, that Mercedes is happy about fooling so many people, becouse fans of current G-Class will now run to dealers and order it. And this can boost sales of G-Class. I am still optimistic and believe, that it is not the new G-Class. 
__________________
"Our life has no sence, if we can't make things better, than our fathers."
Henry Ford
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2005, 12:51 PM
|
#39
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
I also think that it is the next G-calss and I prefer the current one 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-22-2005, 09:48 PM
|
#40
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: born near Toronto, Canada, living near Philly, PA, USA
Posts: 253
|
|
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
It's too different from the current one... they should have kept the essence of the original... these one looks too much like the new ML.
|
I agree...I'm not a huge fan of the G overall, but I think it looks exactly the way it should look, given its history and capabilities...they're turning it into just another one of those expensive, ugly, gas-guzzling gaudy SUVs that rich people will buy for running errands.
__________________
"If it feels good, do it!" Rev. Zug, my 8th grade religion teacher
96 Acura Integra SE sedan with some goodies
|
|
|
|
|
08-23-2005, 06:10 AM
|
#41
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,085
|
I agree...I'm not a huge fan of the G overall, but I think it looks exactly the way it should look, given its history and capabilities...they're turning it into just another one of those expensive, ugly, gas-guzzling gaudy SUVs that rich people will buy for running errands.
|
Agreed 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
