09-24-2007, 01:28 PM
|
#31
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,327
|
|
|
|
09-24-2007, 01:57 PM
|
#32
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
That is 1 hot looking SL even!!!! Loving in already
__________________
|
|
|
09-24-2007, 02:30 PM
|
#33
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mayfair/Brighton
Posts: 1,262
|
And more CLS front end
__________________
MINI MINI MINI MINI MINI MINI MINI MINI
|
|
|
09-24-2007, 04:11 PM
|
#34
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brazil
Posts: 493
|
Soooo wide body'ed!!Finally an really aggressive benz, love It already!
|
|
|
09-24-2007, 05:02 PM
|
#35
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
Originally Posted by Stoopie
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
Originally Posted by RC45
I was under the impression the SL65 is a TT V12, and the SL600 is a NA V12...
|
Both are 6L V12 TT.
|
Err the SL65 AMG is a TT V12, the SL600 isn't equipped with the TT .. The TT version delivers 612bhp@4800rpm, the 'normal' V12 delivers 517bhp@5000rpm!
I know, late reaction
|
You are wrong. Check your facts before you try to correct somene. BOTH are twin turbo V12:s
|
|
|
09-25-2007, 04:07 AM
|
#36
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 955
|
Originally Posted by bmw06m6
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
Looks exactly the same as the current one.
|
Thats because Mercedes are boring ass cars.
|
What ever bimmer boy :roll:
At least they don't look as dreary and boring as BMW's, of which I've driven nearly all current iterations, both M and non-M alike, unlike you who had a go in a... ML 350? pfff... just admit it, you know jack sh1t about MB's and prefer to stand out as another ill informed BMW owner because you've got no passion in "cars", you're just another "fanatic", and fanatics don't give a sh1t about cars, they only care about "their" marque. They never find anything wrong with "their" marque of cars, but know how to shout out sh1t about 'competing' brands because it makes them feel all big and buff
Anyway...
As was said, the SL600 and SL65 both have Twin Turbos, but the 600 has a 5.5 liter V12, whilst the 65 has a 6 liter V12. Both can get an additional +100hp from an ECU update, and a number of owners have done this.
__________________
My new car: MB SLK55 AMG (36months, 40,000miles and still flawless)
My old car: MB SLK230K Brabus - sold
|
|
|
09-25-2007, 09:38 AM
|
#37
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
|
It's looking to be a very aggressive looking car. Not as radical as I would have hoped, though.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
|
|
|
09-25-2007, 03:24 PM
|
#38
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 715
|
|
|
|
09-25-2007, 03:45 PM
|
#39
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
Originally Posted by Shinigami
As was said, the SL600 and SL65 both have Twin Turbos, but the 600 has a 5.5 liter V12, whilst the 65 has a 6 liter V12. Both can get an additional +100hp from an ECU update, and a number of owners have done this.
|
Wonder if it will affect the reliability of the tranny given that there's so much torque in those things.
__________________
|
|
|
09-25-2007, 04:46 PM
|
#40
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
Originally Posted by 5vz-fe
Originally Posted by Shinigami
As was said, the SL600 and SL65 both have Twin Turbos, but the 600 has a 5.5 liter V12, whilst the 65 has a 6 liter V12. Both can get an additional +100hp from an ECU update, and a number of owners have done this.
|
Wonder if it will affect the reliability of the tranny given that there's so much torque in those things.
|
I remember a few years ago when the CL600 came out, they had to tune down the torque because unregulated it was upwards of 800 lbs-ft, if I recalled correctly. It was also the same reason why they had to use the older beefier style 5-speed auto instead of the newer 6-speed. If my memory serves me .
But damn, this SL looks pretty damn good. I don't even really care what it looks like, but those flares make it look extremely good.
Yeah, I think over all this has waaaay better proportions than the SLR.
Looking forward to seeing this car w/o camo.
|
|
|
09-25-2007, 05:10 PM
|
#41
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 953
|
Originally Posted by ae86_16v
Looking forward to seeing this car w/o camo.
|
+1!
The SL looks hot with widened hips. I love the back end.
__________________
|
|
|
09-26-2007, 11:18 AM
|
#42
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brazil
Posts: 493
|
|
|
|
09-26-2007, 11:44 AM
|
#43
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Basque Country
Posts: 1,459
|
I Hope not to be dissapointed by Mercedes Benz; IMO, the SL has always been the most beautiful merc so far thoroughout years and Ive been sometimes asking myself: Is it possible to improve the cars styling in the next edition, and the answer has always been yes until now; see if they improve the cars look although its even to improve some perfect shape
|
|
|
09-26-2007, 01:01 PM
|
#44
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: nfld, Canada
Posts: 915
|
looks like it may have a upward swinging door like aston martin
__________________
"If you even look at that engine, it'll kill you" - JC
|
|
|
09-26-2007, 01:42 PM
|
#45
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 79
|
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
Originally Posted by Stoopie
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
Originally Posted by RC45
I was under the impression the SL65 is a TT V12, and the SL600 is a NA V12...
|
Both are 6L V12 TT.
|
Err the SL65 AMG is a TT V12, the SL600 isn't equipped with the TT .. The TT version delivers 612bhp@4800rpm, the 'normal' V12 delivers 517bhp@5000rpm!
I know, late reaction
|
You are wrong. Check your facts before you try to correct somene. BOTH are twin turbo V12:s
|
Actually fellas .. the SL600 uses a TT 5.5L V12 while the SL65 AMG uses a 6.0L TT V12.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|