Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2008, 12:24 PM   #16
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

sounds like Subaru need the extra cash from sales of stock options after the goof up of the 2008 styling disaster at Subaru... and were forced into needing a "joint effort" car with Toyota.... unlike the Saab/Subaru 92x deal, where Subaru made out like mad cows by selling a non-competing Saabaru
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 12:29 PM   #17
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity View Post
sounds like Subaru need the extra cash from sales of stock options after the goof up of the 2008 styling disaster at Subaru...
You mean the new Impreza or the pig nose? or the bug eye? or the SVX?

I actually liked the pig nose, though. It wasn't that bad looking and you could instantly tell it was a Subie.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 12:49 PM   #18
gobs3z
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,590
Default

A more hopeful image
__________________

"If we could read the secret histories of our enemies, we would find in each story enough sorrow and suffering to disarm all hostility." Longfellow
gobs3z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 12:50 PM   #19
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by gobs3z View Post
A more hopeful image
It is? It looks like a Lexus GS that was hit side-on from both sides.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 01:36 PM   #20
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

The new subaru forester is one ugly SOB
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 01:52 PM   #21
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by HeilSvenska View Post
You mean the new Impreza or the pig nose? or the bug eye? or the SVX?

I actually liked the pig nose, though. It wasn't that bad looking and you could instantly tell it was a Subie.
I rather like the bug eye... and sales show that the world did too

I loved the "pig nose?" I prefer the nomenclature of "alfa-nose" as well

the new 2008 Impreza/ STi..... looks boring, and Korean at best
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 03:38 PM   #22
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

Originally Posted by HeilSvenska View Post
You mean the new Impreza or the pig nose? or the bug eye? or the SVX?

I actually liked the pig nose, though. It wasn't that bad looking and you could instantly tell it was a Subie.
psshh, whatever. I actually like the bug eye WRX's.
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 03:43 PM   #23
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity View Post
I rather like the bug eye... and sales show that the world did too

I loved the "pig nose?" I prefer the nomenclature of "alfa-nose" as well

the new 2008 Impreza/ STi..... looks boring, and Korean at best
Okay. Reverse Alfa nose.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 04:23 PM   #24
04RCSTI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 516
Default

Haha, I'm going to agree, that new 08 looks terrible, inside and out. From what I hear, it performs pretty terribly too. Good thing I got an 06, I think this is the best look of the latter years.

And yes, the 2.0 and the 2.5 without the turbo are slow as sin.

This is mine and my buddy's cars, Black one is mine.
__________________
Coming soon.
04RCSTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 11:20 AM   #25
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

This looks better. Although it's pure speculation at best.


The Toyota version will be sold in Japan only. The rest of us gets the Subie version.

Production at Subaru's Gunma plant.
Boxer 2.0L ~220hp at 6,500 rpm
6 speed manual from the STI
103in wheelbase
2,866lbs
2+2 seating
~2011 release

source: Inside Line
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 05:11 PM   #26
04RCSTI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 516
Default

they have to make an STI version...
__________________
Coming soon.
04RCSTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 05:34 PM   #27
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

Makes sense... although I would love to import a Toyota version
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 09:06 PM   #28
Pokiou
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,451
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity View Post
" Sources suggest that the coupé could cost as little as £10,000"

With a 1.6 liter engine, and 95 hp, no limited slip diff, no passing power, but hey.... at least its .... boring?

And about the £10,000 bit.... V6 Mustangs are cheaper, and have more power... and tons of rigidity in the chassis for those who like bends

Mustangs are not new.. this is.. and doesnt go through fuel like a whore on a saturday night.
Pokiou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 09:15 PM   #29
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by Pokiou View Post
and doesnt go through fuel like a whore on a saturday night.
Wrong.

EPA Mileage ratings
Subaru WRX: 19mpg (city) 24mpg (highway)
Mustang V6: 19mpg (city) 28mpg (highway)

The price of having to wring out more power from a tiny 4-cylinder.
*I used WRX's mileage figures since the new car's supposed to have even smaller capacity yet around the same power. It's lighter, that'd help. But it'll have the STI's gearbox. I don't know what it'll do for cruising.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 09:36 PM   #30
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

Yea, I don't know where people get the misconception that 4 cylinders are almost universally more fuel efficient than other engine configurations. Adding power to a 4 banger has the same fuel efficiency trade offs. Go back to a no compression lame cam design and you'll have a fuel sipper again.
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump