evo #86, Bugatti Veyron

[dingo]

Originally Posted by leo_26782 It is quite surprising that no one noticed something strange on page 87

I still don't notice anything after a second look, what is it?

[TT]

Indeed weird because the same phrase in the text is correct as far as I remember

[dingo]

oh W12......I was looking for something in the picture. ops:

[leo_26782]

Finally

Congrat TT, I was starting to wonder if I remember it wrong It's quite funny that it has to be the picture king who realize a text problem

[stradale]

Thanks a lot for the scans, TT. I was curious about what evo would have to say about the Veyron. Pretty much what I expected, in the end. It's a marvel of engineering indeed and giving it full whack would probably blow my mind, but somehow it's not as appealing as some of the other supercars. Maybe it's the result of Piëch's initial approach. He didn't set out to build the most astonishing supercar ever, but he just had two numbers on his mind (400 and 1000) and subsequently earmarked the empty Bugatti shell to act as the package material.

The styling of both the interior and exterior don't appeal to me either. These colours make it even worse. In the picture on the first page it looks terrible IMHO. The word that actually came to mind immediately, was "gay".

[martin100]

OMG this is the test the Veyron truly deserves, so many pages Thanks infinitely TT i can´t wait to read it!

[sentra_dude]

Originally Posted by TT Always wondered the same mainly because I always thought it would be painfull to click 18 thumbs to get the full pages :bah:

It is painful to click that many thumbs, and breaks up the reading to do that, this way (full size pics) is much better for reading articles, imo.

[TT]

LOL, I just experimentes the thumbs technique in the newest scans.. we'll see what to do next

[dingo]

Originally Posted by sentra_dude Originally Posted by TT Always wondered the same mainly because I always thought it would be painfull to click 18 thumbs to get the full pages :bah: It is painful to click that many thumbs, and breaks up the reading to do that, this way (full size pics) is much better for reading articles, imo.

it depends on how you read it I suppose. I don't read the article from within my browser, I save all the images into my scans folder and read the m later.

[leo_26782]

It depends for sure, I personnaly prefer this way, you just have to scroll down to read the whole article. But well... :bah: Both are as good as the article is

[leo_26782]

Well usually, it flicks to page 2 quite quickly (like now )