Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Hobbies and Leisure Time > Photography



View Poll Results: Which do you guys shoot in?
JPG 14 60.87%
RAW 9 39.13%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2006, 02:35 PM   #1
ae86_16v
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
Default JPG vs RAW

Which do you guys prefer? And of course why?
ae86_16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 02:51 PM   #2
Fleischmann
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
Default

I always take pics in JPEG, the file type is very universal and can be read by every graphic editor. For very high quality shots I use TIF.
__________________
Fleischmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 02:51 PM   #3
sameerrao
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 3,850
Default

Till I got the D50 last week, I didnt have the ability to do raw. I guess I'll do JPEG for some time till I get a proper handle on the camera.

With RAW, you need to process it on the computer, correct?
__________________

"Tazio Nuvolari - The greatest driver of the past, the present and the future" - Ferdinand Porsche
sameerrao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 02:52 PM   #4
TNT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 2,670
Default

well from a computer stand point .PNG saves space but has the same quality of a .jpg
__________________
TNT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 03:46 PM   #5
DeMoN
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
Default

^ not exactly. It all depends in the amount of colors. If the picture has little colors, then GIF is the best, if the pic has plenty of colors, JPG and for an extremelly big amount of colors, PNG is like GIF, but with more colors than 256. GIF has only one thing better than PNG which is, it supports animatino.

They all have different algorithms on how to paint a picture so thats why each is good at it's own.
__________________
Guess who's Back!
DeMoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 03:46 PM   #6
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

I've been shooting in JPEG cause I have quite the trigger happy finger..(taking a lot of shitty shots) and because I only have one 1gb SD card.

If I had a bigger card I'd probably shoot in RAW, but then again its more time consuming to edit them on the computer too.

The ideal way to shoot raws IMO is if you're really setting up the shot. If you have the time, take a couple test shots in jpeg and once you've got the nicest settings, switch it over to RAW.
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 05:04 PM   #7
c0wb0y007
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 554
Default

I used to shoot in jpeg but after having read a few looong boooring but interesting articles and after having had a discussion with a fellow photographer I discided not to shoot in jpeg anymore. A RAW-file is much better than a jpeg cause it contains much more detail ... much more detail in general ... when it comes to colors, sharpness etc ... .

I wouldn't say that a RAW-file is harder to work with in photoshop, it's just a matter what your are used to. When it comes to sharpen the image or adjusting the color balance and fixing levels -> RAW is the name of the game !!!

And I'm not talking about turning a shitty photograph into a masterpiece I'm talking about improving a very good picture even more. A shitty picture should get deleted immediately That is how I work.

RAW-format is much more versatile than jpeg, I experienced it myself last Saterday ... .

If this file format gives me better pictures than it gives me better prints as well so when you snap a nice picture you want to end up with a high-quality print as well.

You can still choose whether you prefer to shoot single RAWs or that you want to combine RAWs with jpegs with most of the DSLR on the market today.
With the D2x you can combine RAWs with jpeg(fine) best of both worlds of course

When you are shooting RAW, I suggest a 512mb card is the absolute minimum. 1 & 2 Gig cards are nice, but I will go for a 4 or even a 8 gig card in the future.

If anyone of you wants to read an interesting article about this matter, then "the big squeeze" in the NikonPro magazine is good for starters.
Or go to google and type "jpeg vs raw" 8)


No matter what ... just enjoy photography


Cheers
__________________
Sitting in the morning sun
I'll be sitting when the evening comes
Watching the ships roll in
And I watch 'em roll away again
Sitting on the dock of the bay
Watching the tide roll away
I'm just sitting on the dock of the bay
Wasting time



http://www.emotionworkshop.org
http://www.stunningnikon.com/
http://www.nikon.co.uk
http://www.sportsshooter.com
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikond3/
c0wb0y007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 10:34 PM   #8
DeMoN
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
Default

my dsc-t1 doesnt shoot raw lol.
__________________
Guess who's Back!
DeMoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 11:54 PM   #9
ae86_16v
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
Default

Originally Posted by sameerrao
With RAW, you need to process it on the computer, correct?
Well it is just more versatile so you could do (process) more with the picture w/o destroying it.

You don't have to process it. . .
ae86_16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 01:54 AM   #10
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

well, for now... i've been shooting in jpg; but when it comes time for the costom shoots, and such... raw will be the name of the game. my experience editing raw vs. jpg is basically the same... only my computer is old and slow... so it does take longer to edit the CR2 files
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 03:19 AM   #11
saadie
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: north-south of nowhere
Posts: 6,869
Default

jpg for me ...
__________________
saadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 05:06 AM   #12
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

jpg.. raw is just to heavy and I shoot too many pics (and don't want to carry 10 GB of memory ).
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 05:41 AM   #13
MartijnGizmo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Groningen - Netherlands
Posts: 1,324
Default

I always shoot RAW. It gives me more dynamic reach and lets me adjust the whitebalance on my computer (lossless!). Why would I let my camera calculate a JPG, when my computer can do it better?
__________________
EOS 5D|EOS 600|15-30|24 1.4 L|135 2 L|2x 580EX|2x CP-E3|ST-E2|2x Pocket Wizzard Plus II|IXUS 850IS|Crumpler|Manfrotto|
MartijnGizmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 12:52 PM   #14
Darkel
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France - Alsace
Posts: 1,311
Default

Interesting, I never used RAW so far but I think I'm gonna give it a try next time My CF being fast enough it's no real problem.
Darkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 01:59 PM   #15
dutchmasterflex
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
Default

Bottom line, if you want the highest quality, RAW is the way to go. If you want to do quick multiple action shots, JPEG will be faster to write to the card allowing more frames per second.
__________________
dutchmasterflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump