Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2007, 09:18 PM   #151
CMonakar
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 287
Default

Seems like the returns progressively diminish when going from the Z06 to ZR1 as compared with the C6 and Z06.

The paint color and rear spoiler look cheap. The back doesn't look distinctive at all. The fenders are nice, but I prefer the Z06 fenders. I like the raw carbon roof, and the front profile of the car with the new hood and wider fenders. The carbon brakes are a really nice touch. The supercharger sounds very interesting. Overall I'm very impressed they built it. Can't wait to see what kind of numbers it generates.
__________________
20b GT42RS RX7 Project Car
A4 3.2Q DD.
CMonakar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 09:22 PM   #152
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

Originally Posted by RC45 View Post
I am very interested in that little tid bit

The cost of getting my 6th swapped out for a 202mph gear ratio and the hardening rebuild, is about the cost of a new tranny anyway.

If they keep the 3.42 rear end, I am guessing the 6th gear will be about .75 which would give the ZR1 a 202mph topend at 6500rpm.

My 7000 redline would get me to 215.... so I would be able to play with the new kids at top speed as well

If they opt for a .71 then the ZR1 will be good for 210... and I would be geared for 229
215 sounds very good to me already. With that you can try very much harder at the track to find your next weakest link LOL.
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 09:37 PM   #153
r2r
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,562
Default

Nice! Hopefully the power increase can outweigh the weight difference and give substantially better performance figures.
r2r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 09:46 PM   #154
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

100 more hp should have no problem outweighting the 150 more lbs. However, why on earth do you need 19/20 inch wheels?...Put on a set of 18s and save urself 50lbs unsprung weight.

Why add a root type supercharger just to get 100hp? You could have change the cam and fine tune the air/fuel ratio and get more than 100hp out of the LS7. If they go the NA route, they would have maintained the perfect 50/50 balance instead of the nose heavy 52/48.

The price tag is absolutely ridiculous...90-120k?..Oh comeon. I bet at least 20k of the price hike is caused by the braking system. I don't see there is anything wrong with the ones on the Z.

Tom Wallace, vehicle line executive of Performance Cars, described driving the ZR1 as simply awesome. "It's fast and refined," he confided, adding that it has "a soft clutch, great midrange torque, compliant ride and brakes that don't squeal." He alluded to an expectation that the ZR1 would beat a Ferrari F430. Not just talk, as Tom races competitively. Pricing hasn't been announced, but we know buyers are lined up around the country. We've called the Z06 a budget-minded supercar, so the ZR1 is likely to be a reasonably priced exotic. We'll venture a guess between $90,000 and $120,000. And at that price, the performance is sure to be a steal!
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....&page_number=3

Oh for pete sake, beat a 430?? At least aim alittle higher. He's more like dis-ing the ZR1 than prasing it.
__________________

Last edited by 5vz-fe; 12-19-2007 at 09:56 PM.
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 09:54 PM   #155
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by 5vz-fe View Post
100 more hp should have no problem outweighting the 150 more lbs. However, why on earth do you need 19/20 inch wheels?...Put on a set of 18s and save urself 50lbs unsprung weight.
Yeah, with the ZR1 at 620bhp, I will need to bump my NA 660 to at least 700 for a little insurance - as we know that many ZR1's wont be staying stock, and exhaust, pulley and ECU tweaks would eat up that 40bhp cushion I have in no time - plus they get PS2's as stock tyres *SHOCK*.... that means from day 1 they have big velcro hoops for tyres.

Now if only the C6 came in a fixed roof coupe hardtop profile instead of the fast back
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 09:55 PM   #156
sameerrao
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 3,850
Default

Originally Posted by RC45 View Post
I am very interested in that little tid bit

The cost of getting my 6th swapped out for a 202mph gear ratio and the hardening rebuild, is about the cost of a new tranny anyway.

If they keep the 3.42 rear end, I am guessing the 6th gear will be about .75 which would give the ZR1 a 202mph topend at 6500rpm.

My 7000 redline would get me to 215.... so I would be able to play with the new kids at top speed as well

If they opt for a .71 then the ZR1 will be good for 210... and I would be geared for 229

I take it you are not too impressed with the ZR1 considering it is not a NA engine (wonder if they have track tested it for heat soak) and it is heavier than the stock Z06.

I wonder if they should have gone for a NA 8 litre lump or hotter engine tune instead of SCing it. I bet it would have been lighter option.
__________________

"Tazio Nuvolari - The greatest driver of the past, the present and the future" - Ferdinand Porsche
sameerrao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 10:03 PM   #157
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by sameerrao View Post
I take it you are not too impressed with the ZR1 considering it is not a NA engine (wonder if they have track tested it for heat soak) and it is heavier than the stock Z06.

I wonder if they should have gone for a NA 8 litre lump or hotter engine tune instead of SCing it. I bet it would have been lighter option.
Not impressed at all (but the car looks sexy with those bling wheels and the news of Michelin PS2's stock is good) - but the SC was cheapest way they had to make a quick n dirty 600+bhp car and meet emmisions and fuel consumption needs.

Now Dodge didnt care (or maybe their fewer produciton numbers mean they can ignore the CAFE rules) as they just punched the V10 to 8.4 litres and called it a day.

There is a new Viper at MTI that they are playign with - stock its 600bhp translated to almost 560rwhp 540rwtq on the same dyno that showed my car putting down 580rwhp 508rwtq - so the ZR1 better bring its A-Game, this new Viper is a monster right out the box.

And I better find some NA HP quick to be able to park in the big boys parking lot

I have a few tricks up my sleeve arriving in January - so hopefully we will make the NA 700bhp mark and be ready for the new kids.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 10:04 PM   #158
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

Originally Posted by RC45 View Post
Yeah, with the ZR1 at 620bhp, I will need to bump my NA 660 to at least 700 for a little insurance - as we know that many ZR1's wont be staying stock, and exhaust, pulley and ECU tweaks would eat up that 40bhp cushion I have in no time - plus they get PS2's as stock tyres *SHOCK*.... that means from day 1 they have big velcro hoops for tyres.

Now if only the C6 came in a fixed roof coupe hardtop profile instead of the fast back
How much is a good cond. C6 Z going for right now?
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 10:06 PM   #159
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by 5vz-fe View Post
How much is a good cond. C6 Z going for right now?
Mid 50's to mid 60's still.
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 10:09 PM   #160
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

Given in another year or 2 I guess. So any hint on your January upgrades?
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 10:19 PM   #161
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default

00 more hp should have no problem outweighting the 150 more lbs. However, why on earth do you need 19/20 inch wheels?...Put on a set of 18s and save urself 50lbs unsprung weight.
*Points to the 15.5 " wheels one more time. Wont fit under 19s.
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 10:24 PM   #162
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

The price tag is absolutely ridiculous...90-120k?..Oh comeon. I bet at least 20k of the price hike is caused by the braking system. I don't see there is anything wrong with the ones on the Z.
Point to the unnecessary 15.5 brakes
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 10:40 PM   #163
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

This car is aimed not at people who might cross shop between a 911 TT and the new ZR1 for a single car, but rather aimed at the well heeled enthusiast who will buy the ZR1 to put alongside his/her 911TT... so for $120 large, it s a great cheap 2nd super car

Plus it will most probably be one of his/her fastest cars hehe
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 11:29 AM   #164
sentra_dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,610
Default

Well I'm glad this car is a reality, but I'm not a fan of the styling. The styling enhancements on the Z06 work much better. The color is interesting, but it does not suit this car. The wheels are disgusting and too large and that front side vent is hideous. The rear spoiler looks like it was glued on, but at least its not some kind of wing. Overall I'm pretty disappointed, I think they could have done a much better job 'muscling-up' this ZR1. I was hoping they would go towards darker wheels as well, instead of these polished things. Honestly I'd rather have a Z06 and do some simple mods to the engine.
__________________

------------
1992 Toyota Celica GT 5spd, intake.
sentra_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 01:40 PM   #165
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by sentra_dude View Post
The color is interesting, but it does not suit this car. The wheels are disgusting and too large and that front side vent is hideous. The rear spoiler looks like it was glued on, but at least its not some kind of wing.
It doesn't look so bad in darker colors and non-chrome rims. Dare I say it looks good like this?


I just can't wait for someone to do a performance test on this car!
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump