Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Hobbies and Leisure Time > Photography



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-22-2005, 05:33 AM   #1
dingo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
Default Media photographers - question

This might sound stupid but I just saw something on TV that made me wonder.

There was a story about some sick kid and then they showed him sitting in the park being photographed by some newspaper. Now this photographer had some huge camera (zoom lense or whatever), but he was standing about 5m away from the kid.

My question is why do these guys use such expensive cameras for what in the end will be some tiny black&white picture in the newspaper? Any cheap digital camera would be enough for the typical newspaper shots....
__________________
dingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 09:45 AM   #2
MartijnGizmo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Groningen - Netherlands
Posts: 1,324
Default

Yup, in fact you're right, but luckily high-end camera's offer more than just bigger pics.
__________________
EOS 5D|EOS 600|15-30|24 1.4 L|135 2 L|2x 580EX|2x CP-E3|ST-E2|2x Pocket Wizzard Plus II|IXUS 850IS|Crumpler|Manfrotto|
MartijnGizmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 09:50 AM   #3
dingo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
Default

Originally Posted by MartijnGizmo
Yup, in fact you're right, but luckily high-end camera's offer more than just bigger pics.
Yes I know they offer more than that, but will you really notice those differences in a grainy, small, black and white newspaper photo?
__________________
dingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 01:18 PM   #4
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Yes I know they offer more than that, but will you really notice those differences in a grainy, small, black and white newspaper photo?
then what do you show when you get asked to submit your photo for something like the pulitzer prize
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 02:36 PM   #5
Darkel
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France - Alsace
Posts: 1,311
Default

Originally Posted by dingo
Yes I know they offer more than that, but will you really notice those differences in a grainy, small, black and white newspaper photo?
What if that expensive cam belongs to the photographer and not to the newspaper ? I mean he'd probably prefer to take pics with his equipment than whith a crappy p&s cam :bah: Especially if he also covers some major events.

Most of those pics (grainy, w&b etc) are actually taken with some cheap cams (I noticed that last year when 2 of them came to a local event; oh god those were amateurs ...)
Darkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 03:15 PM   #6
gigdy
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
Default

i doubt he only uses that camera to take pics like that. Say if he goes to a sporting even or somethin with action. A crappy camera isnt gonna cut it. There is also big color pictures in newspapers too.
__________________
gigdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 03:45 PM   #7
SDK2003
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solihull - UK
Posts: 502
Default

My guess is that he uses the camera for other purposes as well.
__________________


|| Canon 20D x2 | 17-40L | 24-70L | 100 USM Macro | 100-400L IS | 580EX ||
SDK2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 04:58 PM   #8
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

Indeed, when you have a big balled camera, you can take basic pics you could take with an IXUS, but on a mighty camera you can bump onto it a 1200mm lense and shoot an hyperquality pic of a turd on the moon
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 05:59 PM   #9
gigdy
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
Default

Originally Posted by TT
Indeed, when you have a big balled camera, you can take basic pics you could take with an IXUS, but on a mighty camera you can bump onto it a 1200mm lense and shoot an hyperquality pic of a turd on the moon

mmmm moon turd.
__________________
gigdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 06:45 PM   #10
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

Well, I guess you need to dump them up there too every now and then
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2005, 06:48 PM   #11
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by TT
Well, I guess you need to dump them up there too every now and then
The question is how you get it out of your spacesuit
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2005, 03:54 AM   #12
dingo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
Default

Ok guys, I realise it was a stupid question - even I ask them sometimes.

Originally Posted by TT
....shoot an hyperquality pic of a turd on the moon
have you got any examples of this, please?
__________________
dingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2005, 07:14 PM   #13
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

Nope dang, as realized by AL, all the turds dumped on the moon got stuck in astronauts' boots.. dang
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump