07-16-2004, 06:56 PM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
evo #70 - DB9 vs Continental GT vs SL55 AMG vs 996TT
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-16-2004, 07:04 PM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Puebla
Posts: 1,660
|
Great article TT.
I´m amazed with the SL55 acceleration next to the 911 Turbo! 
|
|
|
|
|
07-16-2004, 07:15 PM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
Can't believe the SL 55 kicked som 911 ass in acceleration..Excellent 
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2004, 02:13 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gdynia, Poland.
Posts: 175
|
Wonderful comparison yet I dont enjoy any of these cars...Thank you very much for this scan!!!
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2004, 02:57 AM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Anaheim, California USA
Posts: 551
|
|
Originally Posted by frua
Wonderful comparison yet I dont enjoy any of these cars...Thank you very much for this scan!!!
|
How could you not have enjoyed them!!! I completely enjoyed it.  Thanks for sharing!
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2004, 09:34 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 133
|
the sl is powered monster machine, really!!
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2004, 01:22 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 258
|
Proof that the 911 turbo is KING! But the DB9 is a true beauty.
__________________
Porsche:
Spiritually,we never stray too far from the racetrack!
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2004, 02:10 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 1,117
|
wut are you guy talking about teh sl55 having better acceleration? the 911 beat the sl55 but 0.5s from 0 to 60 and handle better on the track.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2004, 02:15 PM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
|
fab scan again. just waiting for post to drop my mag home some time next week  i was expecting to see new 911 to be parting this test, well for a turbo version of that i guess we´ll have to wait for a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2004, 03:48 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
|
THX. I was hoping somebody would scan this article. TT to the rescue
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2004, 04:02 PM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
|
0-60 in 5,4 secs for the DB9...that's a bit harsh 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-18-2004, 02:21 AM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 243
|
Naturally - I was more than happy with the result of this test.
Thanks TT.
|
|
|
|
|
07-18-2004, 11:59 AM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 787
|
Thanks for the scan ...I wonder what happened with the DB9 this time at least it´s still the most beautiful both in and outside by far
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 01:41 PM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 141
|
DB9 is sportier but Continental GT is more elegant -- both my dream GT
__________________
Ferrari Nuts!
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
