Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > General Discussion > General Chat

General Chat General chat about anything that doesn't fit in another section here



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2006, 06:50 PM   #16
antonioledesma
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Posts: 2,306
Default

imperial system is archaic and useless
antonioledesma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 07:12 PM   #17
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default

just the gen. public can't grasp the simplicity... kinda sounds stupid... but we are dealing with the US
Not necessarily.. A new system thats the basis is kinda like a language. If you try to learn swahili at 40 your screwed. Same goes for metric versus imperial. That being said they have been teaching both systems in schools since I was a kid. That being said Id argue neither is really superior. Once you get to know the systems you can use any of them.
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 10:06 PM   #18
novass
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,660
Default

Growing up in the US I learned to use our system ever since I was a kid. Metric only came up every so often.

Now that I am working on Ferraris and other European cars, I have to use metric constantly and since I am doing that and living in the US at the same time, I have to know how to convert one to the other and vice versa.

I must say I do prefer metric over other measurement systems. In my line of work dealing with vintage cars from all over and race cars, you get exposed to numerous types of measurement. BSP, which isnt used so much anymore and is an absolute nightmare, then youve got SAE, AN-.....it can get a little confusing.
__________________
2001 Audi A4 1.8T Quattro 5spd
1963 Chevy NovaSS 415hp 355ci V8

"Live as if your were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever."
-Mahatma Gandhi
novass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 10:27 PM   #19
GT-R_R34
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Abilene, TX USA
Posts: 798
Default

i grew up with the metric system until i moved to the US. i know how to use both, but metric is taking over most of measurement here if you notice most car now have metric instead of standard. the only good think about miles is that it seem that you're going slower than kilometers. (160km to 100miles)
GT-R_R34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2006, 08:58 AM   #20
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

I agree with graywolf. Neither system is superior to the other. I naturally prefer metric, because it's what I was taught and brought up on, but you can't really say one is simpler, or one is less confusing. It's all a matter of preference.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2006, 11:04 PM   #21
T-Bird
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
Default

well Mojo most Mechanics have both sets already since even Hondas (which I work with eventhough they are labeled Acura) use both sets and so does my pathfinder and the Thunderbird they are mixed together and that gets confusing enough but you start to get used to it quickly. And most basic sets of Mechaincs tools from like Craftsman have an equal amount of both metric and standard (as they are called in the US)

Actually a really funny thing is that on the morning radio station I listen to the DJ does a thing called Lin's Bin where he answers peoples E-mails and their relations to Rock and this morning the question was (simplified) is Metric rock and roll and he went on this huge thing about how Imperial is much more rock and roll in the sense when you are saying she was 5 foot 4 and not so and so CM or they were four miles high instead of Kilometers high but then in Rap metric seems to be the way to go when refering to units of measure and illegal substances or to the diameter munitions.

click on the first one on the list it's pretty funny actually check them all out.
http://93xrt.com/program/detail/linsbin.html
T-Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2006, 12:14 AM   #22
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

Interesting observation, T-Bird. Never noticed that.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 05:59 AM   #23
fsandys
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 498
Default

I use both I was taught metric at school but I've always been more comfortable with weights in imperial and certainly MILES per hour not this continental kilometers per hour!!!
__________________
--
fsandys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 06:12 AM   #24
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

Whereabouts do you live. I was taught only metric and find imperial far too confusing, except for certain things like heights of people etc.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 07:24 AM   #25
FoxFour
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charleston, S.C. USA
Posts: 985
Default

When I was studying to be an aircraft mechanic at 19, I was able to learn the Imperial system, using it all the time and being young you can remember the sizes quite fast. But I so love the metric system for measuring things plus it's easy to remember the sizes, even a public- schooled educated person like myself can remember the sizes- 1,2,56,6,19
__________________
1996 Mustang Cobra. Vortech Kompressor installed.
Many pilots of the time were the opinion that a fighter pilot in a closed cockpit was an impossible thing, because you should smell the enemy. You could smell them because of the oil they were burning.
Adolf Galland
FoxFour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 12:18 PM   #26
TransAm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 2,766
Default

In the UK we are kind of in between metric and imperial. You buy petrol in litres, beer in pints. We use miles rather than KMs.

Metric has been taught in schools since the 1970s, and physics is taught in metres kilometres yet we use miles!

Builders/engineers sometimes use imperial to discuss rough estimates, almost guaranteed with a person over 50 years old, but the detail work will be done using milimetres measurement (metric).

I would prefer the complete metric system rather than the mix up we currently have in the UK.

Its easy to convert stuff anyway. There are roughly 2lb in 1 kg, roughly 1 yard = 1 metre, roughly 4 litres in a gallon, mph divided by 2 = metres/sec, etc.
__________________
Current: 2008 BMW 118d SE, 2002 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda CBR600RR

Previous: 2003 Z4 3.0i SMG, 1995 Aprilia RS250
TransAm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 02:21 PM   #27
fsandys
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 498
Default

I'm glad you said roughly but as soon as you put a few together 1 yard becomes nowhere near 1 metre!! :s
__________________
--
fsandys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 02:25 PM   #28
TransAm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 2,766
Default

Originally Posted by fsandys
I'm glad you said roughly but as soon as you put a few together 1 yard becomes nowhere near 1 metre!! :s
The litre / gallon one is the furthest out.

I earn my crust as an Estimator, maybe that is why I am so fond of my 'rule of thumb' calcs!
__________________
Current: 2008 BMW 118d SE, 2002 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda CBR600RR

Previous: 2003 Z4 3.0i SMG, 1995 Aprilia RS250
TransAm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 04:51 PM   #29
coombsie66
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somerset/london
Posts: 1,636
Default

Originally Posted by TransAm
In the UK we are kind of in between metric and imperial. You buy petrol in litres, beer in pints. We use miles rather than KMs.

Metric has been taught in schools since the 1970s, and physics is taught in metres kilometres yet we use miles!

Builders/engineers sometimes use imperial to discuss rough estimates, almost guaranteed with a person over 50 years old, but the detail work will be done using milimetres measurement (metric).

I would prefer the complete metric system rather than the mix up we currently have in the UK.

Its easy to convert stuff anyway. There are roughly 2lb in 1 kg, roughly 1 yard = 1 metre, roughly 4 litres in a gallon, mph divided by 2 = metres/sec, etc.

Yeah, i love the way we go about it, its hillarious, im always ordering a 3 metre length of 16 guage 1-1/2" pipe, or 2" box section. Mix and match everywhere you go! Especially in the engineering or building trade.

All i need is the 25.4mm per inch, that seems to get me by!
__________________
coombsie66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 09:43 PM   #30
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

Football field measurements are in yards and feet, but now that metric seems to be the way to go here, it's all really weird.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump