Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > American Cars

American Cars Area dedicated to American Cars from Classic, Muscle, to Modern!



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2004, 06:07 PM   #16
Vansquish
Regular User
 
Vansquish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA/ Bloomington, IN, USA
Posts: 2,624
Default

Originally Posted by FordGTGuy
sorry didn't mean to start an arguement just wanted to know everyones views.

In my oppinion theirs no way in hell. shit the GT-90 had 1200 hp v-12 and only reached 235 mph. ops:
Where the fuck are you getting your numbers? The GT-90 had a 720bhp quad turbo V12, not a 1200bhp one, and it never completed top speed testing, the limit that was set on the car was 40mph because it was a concept car and had no real engineering so far as the aerodynamics and chassis were concerned.
Vansquish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2004, 06:13 PM   #17
jorge
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Puebla
Posts: 1,660
Default

The Koenigsegg CCR is starting to sell, and IMO it´s the only serious car at this moment capable of going around 250 mph. But of course it has to be proved....
__________________
jorge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2004, 08:38 PM   #18
aks
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 566
Default

Originally Posted by jorge
The Koenigsegg CCR is starting to sell, and IMO it´s the only serious car at this moment capable of going around 250 mph. But of course it has to be proved....
yeh, and i seriously cannot wait for the day they do prove it!!
aks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2004, 10:44 PM   #19
FordGTGuy
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: VA, Norfolk.
Posts: 833
Default

i thought the ccr was at 245? limit or is that the cc?
__________________
"No poor dumb bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."-Patton WW2
FordGTGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2004, 11:06 PM   #20
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

How does it have a transaxle? the engine is in the front and the drive wheels are in the back if the trans is in the back it is most likely a seperate unit from the axle in the rear much like on the Corvette where the Tranny and rear differential are sperate and bolted together. you see transaxles in AWD, FWD and Rear/mid engine cars rarely on front engine rear wheel drive cars.
i do believe you may have answered your own question... the transmission is on the rear wheels to atchieve a 50/50 wieght distrabution for the concept car
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 01:54 AM   #21
noliebro
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancaster,CA,US
Posts: 389
Default

wow, i wish it was that easy, Companies like Bugatti and Koenigsegg spend a lot of time on aerodynamics and then Ford comes out with a car that is about as aerodynamic as an Audi TT and it goes 260mph, Sarcasm :roll:
__________________


In a Porsche 911, you're going to have a very good time actually driving the thing, but everyone is going to hate you. They're going to give you dirty looks as you drive by, call you names at the lights, vandalise your paintwork in the night and never, ever let you out of a side turning. That's a given.

In the Vantage, everyone's going to want your babies.
-J.C.
noliebro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 02:22 AM   #22
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Just remember it can ahppen though..

In 1988 Callaway went 255 mph in this "overweight plastic leafspring bathtub"..


RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 02:42 AM   #23
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

Oh yes, the Callaway Sledgehammer isn't it ? A 880 bhp twin-turbo engine and a top speed of 400 km/h +
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 11:38 AM   #24
SFDMALEX
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,337
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Just remember it can ahppen though..

In 1988 Callaway went 255 mph in this "overweight plastic leafspring bathtub"..


But look at it mate. Doesnt matter if it went 300mph, its still a brutal looking overweight plastic leafspring bathtub.
SFDMALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 06:33 PM   #25
BADMIHAI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
Default

This topic is more proof of how big of an idiot FordGTGuy really is.
BADMIHAI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 07:29 PM   #26
noliebro
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancaster,CA,US
Posts: 389
Default

^^^^^^^
This topic is more proof of how big of an idiot FordGTGuy really is.
harsh, real harsh, half true, but harsh
__________________


In a Porsche 911, you're going to have a very good time actually driving the thing, but everyone is going to hate you. They're going to give you dirty looks as you drive by, call you names at the lights, vandalise your paintwork in the night and never, ever let you out of a side turning. That's a given.

In the Vantage, everyone's going to want your babies.
-J.C.
noliebro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 07:35 PM   #27
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
This topic is more proof of how big of an idiot FordGTGuy really is.
just misinformed. You gotta remember how it was when you were his age, There is alot of maturing that happens between his age and ours.
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 08:26 PM   #28
Vansquish
Regular User
 
Vansquish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA/ Bloomington, IN, USA
Posts: 2,624
Default

Originally Posted by blah
Originally Posted by BADMIHAI
This topic is more proof of how big of an idiot FordGTGuy really is.
just misinformed. You gotta remember how it was when you were his age, There is alot of maturing that happens between his age and ours.
Misinformed is one thing, but spitting out blatantly incorrect facts and then sticking to them is just dumb. You've only got a year on him (or so the profile thingies seem to say) but you're much more reasonable than he seems to be.

The Veyron's quoted top speed is 252mph, the Ford Shelby cobra concept, with a mere 605bhp is geared to do a theoretical 267mph...HOWEVER, its aerodynamics would NEVER allow it to do such speeds, at least not with anything near the power it has now.
__________________
me-- "Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't. Sometimes I feel like the moon is made of cheese"

my Hindibonics-speaking Indian roommate--"Dawgs, do you have any idea how much bacteria that would take?"
Vansquish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 10:39 AM   #29
Skaala
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 1,835
Default

265+ does'nt sound very likely...... but who knows?
__________________
"Driving the R8 is like smearing honey into Keira Knightly!" - Jeremy Clarkson
"In principle, this car is too fast for my thoughts!" (Walter Röhrl about the 600+hp Audi S1 Sport)
Skaala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 03:54 PM   #30
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

mabey to put it into easy terms...
the amount of air pushing against the car is 16 times greater then what you would feel traveling at 67mph.
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump