12-26-2007, 03:32 PM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
Zero to 200 and Back... TT GT vs. TT Gallardo vs. S7 TT vs. TT Z06 vs TT Viper
|
|
|
12-26-2007, 04:52 PM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 417
|
Those Heffner cars sure do destroy massive chunks of road. Im surprised how fast the GT's 0-60 and 0-100 times are even with is massive tyres, that kind of BHP is hard to manage.
I also love Lingenfelters "We've done this a dozen times before and its never once failed". I guess they dont have motoring journos on their development team to test their cars hard enough
__________________
Doodle!
|
|
|
12-26-2007, 05:02 PM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
Originally Posted by JoeHahn
Those Heffner cars sure do destroy massive chunks of road. Im surprised how fast the GT's 0-60 and 0-100 times are even with is massive tyres, that kind of BHP is hard to manage.
I also love Lingenfelters "We've done this a dozen times before and its never once failed". I guess they dont have motoring journos on their development team to test their cars hard enough
|
Their "on staff" (not really, the owner of the car's "staff driver") is far more brutal on the car then the C+D guys were.... In the numerous days of testing that I was on for the Lingenfelter car, the brakes were never an issue, but rather the transmission was not strong enough.
what is truly amazing, is that the GT is very "stock" with exception to the TT setup! The LPE car is very heavy..
|
|
|
12-26-2007, 05:00 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,201
|
Thanks for the scans, this will make a nice read!
__________________
|
|
|
12-26-2007, 05:05 PM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
Thank you, I was waiting for a comparo like that
__________________
|
|
|
12-26-2007, 08:26 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 634
|
Thanks for the scans. I'd take the Ford GT whether it was the fastest or not. Love the first page; what a beautiful car.
|
|
|
12-27-2007, 01:42 AM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
|
Nice scans
__________________
Sorry if I cannot express myself correctly, but I don't know English as good as I want, so my answers will probably be the same in many cases.
|
|
|
12-27-2007, 03:30 AM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,420
|
I dunno what it is about it, but I'd take the Gallardo. I always thought it would amazing if they made it RWD, and now they have, and they added more power for good measure.
__________________
|
|
|
12-27-2007, 03:51 AM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
Originally Posted by ferrarif1fan89
I dunno what it is about it, but I'd take the Gallardo. I always thought it would amazing if they made it RWD, and now they have, and they added more power for good measure.
|
Jason's latest Gallardo TT is still AWD, and has over 100 more HP to the wheels if this RWD Gallardo does 10.5's @138 mph, the new one should be 10.1 +- @ low 140's !!
It should be said, tho... that CD's calculation for HP may be pretty close for the Viper, and Vette... but they were both also sandbagging
The GT made a one time run with 933 RWHP, and has less drivetrain loss then even the Gallardo from what I've been told
|
|
|
12-27-2007, 04:21 AM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,562
|
Nice!
I remember you mentioned about participating in this test a while back, and now finally it's published.
The sounds from all the cars must have been amazing to hear.
|
|
|
12-29-2007, 11:53 AM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,451
|
nice scans man .. u got Pm :p
|
|
|
12-29-2007, 10:40 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 142
|
Thanks for the scans!
Looks like Heffner does some high-quality work; neither of his cars apparently had any problems, while those of the established tuners did. I'd love to see the Veyron included in this kind of test.
|
|
|
12-29-2007, 11:27 PM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
Originally Posted by Guibo
Thanks for the scans!
Looks like Heffner does some high-quality work; neither of his cars apparently had any problems, while those of the established tuners did. I'd love to see the Veyron included in this kind of test.
|
They did try to get a Veyron, but C+D ran into a couple issues.
1. They only managed to contact Bugatti to get a car 2 weeks before the date they needed it for test. (C+D claim they were trying to get ahold of them 6 months in advance.... I trust the guy who is in charge of Bugatti NA who told me 2 weeks)
2. the only Veyron in town is not going to be used for magazine testing.
However... RT did their 0-200 mph test, and that can be used pretty accurately to compare against these cars... with 0-200 in 24.5ish seconds.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|