01-07-2004, 12:37 AM
|
#31
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 1,489
|
IT IS A 13 LITER YEAH 13! 13000 CC
__________________
Current cars: Audi A4 3.slow +Subaru STI + Mitsu Montero
|
|
|
01-07-2004, 12:59 AM
|
#32
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 183
|
I don't even think its a good engineering exercise. 1000hp from 13.4L? That's not even 100hp per litre. Lots of cars do better (Enzo, CC8S, CGT, Macca, 360, RS4, S2000, etc etc). I don't think Displacement on Demand is new technology either. I forget where I've seen it, but I've seen it before (either on some other GM or on a Benz).
Finally, it's not a supercar, nor is it meant to be. GM and Caddy know that. It's just a big ol' GT. They won't build it. It's just a marketing thing (why do they spend millions of bucks on marketing things? I dunno).
|
|
|
01-07-2004, 03:35 AM
|
#33
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
|
yea its on the new Corvette Zonda.
__________________
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 04:46 PM
|
#34
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 843
|
I think this car is actually the most stupid I have ever seen. You don't need 16 cylinders and what is the point of having 1000hp on a chassis like the cadillac's which wouldnt even be able to start using the engine's power properly. And 2 valve per cylinder + a pushrod set-up?? I think Cadillac really is trying to go back in time..
__________________
"It's not long before Marco arrives, but he's at least five minutes behind an epic wall of noise that's been bouncing off the rock faces like a sonic pinball. Onlookers, of which there are many, seem relieved when the livid red Ferrari skims into view, happier still when they see it's driven by a friendly Italian, and not, as the thunderous sound effects suggested, the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse." Evo #059
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 10:12 PM
|
#35
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Media, Pa
Posts: 515
|
[quote="blah"]how do you figure they would use it all the time?[/quote
My car is supposed to get 20 miles a gallon. I get 10, because I use the power at almost every oppurtunity. If I had a 16, I would keep those cylinders lit (at least till I lost my license).
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 10:32 PM
|
#36
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 980
|
just wondering.... what's the power-to-weight ratio of this so-called V16 "new supercar"? LMAO
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 11:28 PM
|
#37
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,670
|
|
Originally Posted by mrzonda
I don't even think its a good engineering exercise. 1000hp from 13.4L? That's not even 100hp per litre. Lots of cars do better (Enzo, CC8S, CGT, Macca, 360, RS4, S2000, etc etc).
|
The thing is... this doesn't really seem like a tuned engine. My guess is that they made the V16 to reminisce of the old old cadillacs using modern technology, and it just happened to end up with about 1000hp. I mean its a pretty huge engine, I doubt they used many high-performance parts to get that figgure. Plus Id love to own a car that huge with 1000hp, in fact id love to own any car with 1000hp, but this one would be awesome because its designed to have that much power while others are just modded up to that figgure. I can picture driving down the highway when a vette pulls up beside u and flips u off... just give it some gas, and he'll be impressed. lol
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 11:36 PM
|
#38
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 865
|
|
Originally Posted by blah
yea its on the new Corvette Zonda.
|
what the hell is a Corvette Zonda? and by the way Cadillac said they wont make it, it was to show how the selective cylinder programs work.
__________________
Blah Blah Blah! Ra! Ra! Ra!
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 02:58 AM
|
#39
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
|
No i was answering ZOndas questions.
__________________
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 03:13 AM
|
#40
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 865
|
oh ok
__________________
Blah Blah Blah! Ra! Ra! Ra!
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 05:12 AM
|
#41
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 32
|
They need to turbo charge it make it around 3,000 hp then use it for supercars
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 05:23 AM
|
#42
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 865
|
they will NEVER! use this car in production It isn't even very fast due to the insane weight.
__________________
Blah Blah Blah! Ra! Ra! Ra!
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 10:45 AM
|
#43
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Media, Pa
Posts: 515
|
[quote="hemi_fan"]
|
Originally Posted by mrzonda
I don't even think its a good engineering exercise. 1000hp from 13.4L? That's not even 100hp per litre. Lots of cars do better (Enzo, CC8S, CGT, Macca, 360, RS4, S2000, etc etc).
|
My guess is that Caddy just did that so they could have a throwback to older times. Like the thunderbird, gt, and all those other fluff mobiles. This throwback provides media coverage, as does the 1001 horsepower.
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 10:59 AM
|
#44
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
|
way to heavy...but it doesn't look bad at all.
__________________
|
|
|
01-13-2004, 03:38 PM
|
#45
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miskolc, Hungary
Posts: 101
|
0-100kmph takes 3.7sec! Man.. this thing is faster than a Carrera GT! And MUCH more heavier!
1300NM.. It has more power than God!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|