06-22-2005, 08:28 AM
|
#16
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Nope, mine is just slightly larger than the "virgin" lense and it appects already the weight balance of the camera! For yours you will need to train your forearms before going out and take pics. Mine is a 58 mm like Darkel's!
I really can't see why yours has to be 70+!!
__________________
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 08:35 AM
|
#17
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
Originally Posted by TT
I really can't see why yours has to be 70+!!
|
Maybe the dumb girl at the shop just told me the wrong size, wouldn't suprise me. I guess I will find out on Friday......
__________________
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 08:36 AM
|
#18
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Within the user manual you usally find a list of accessories and in there you should be able to see the diameter of the available filters.
__________________
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 08:39 AM
|
#19
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
Ah yes I found it and seems she was wrong.
It says the thread diameter is 58mm and it weighs about 19g.
__________________
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 08:51 AM
|
#20
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 329
|
hey tt do you keep a camera with you everywhere? or only when you know there will be cars. Around here i see atleast one exotic and several classics every single day and some of them i have gotten on my cell cam, but like the pininfarina maserati i shot the other day i wished that i had a better cam the shots were sucky.
__________________
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 11:58 AM
|
#21
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Yeah dingo, for most non-SLR cameras, 58 is the correct diameter. spank the lady next time you see her
gtx, yes, I have my camera with me 99% of the time, that's why I rarely miss an opportunity  if a car is parked somewhere, TT will have a picture most of the time
__________________
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 01:04 PM
|
#22
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
gtx, yes, I have my camera with me 99% of the time, that's why I rarely miss an opportunity if a car is parked somewhere, TT will have a picture most of the time
|
some definate good advice; you never know what is parked downtown, or at a shopping center... or even passing by.
anyway, has anybody here used light-pollution filters??? im looking to perhaps get one of that nature today. in any case, i'll show the results of it when i get back from my mini-vacation
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 02:02 PM
|
#23
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Czech Republic, Europe
Posts: 667
|
Originally Posted by TT
BTW, because of us, JW will soon be the top result if you will google for "polarizer filter" 
|
You would have to let google into the forums first  .
__________________
<---- Look into my Eye and shiver.
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 05:15 PM
|
#24
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France - Alsace
Posts: 1,311
|
Originally Posted by Cigarette1
Sony polarizing filters are +-65EUR overhere and only 45-55USD in US
|
But they are 30mm I guess, not 58, that makes a big difference
|
|
|
06-23-2005, 11:55 AM
|
#25
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 319
|
Originally Posted by Darkel
Originally Posted by Cigarette1
Sony polarizing filters are +-65EUR overhere and only 45-55USD in US
|
But they are 30mm I guess, not 58, that makes a big difference 
|
yea, 33mm, the 58 are +-150EUR
what difference does the 58mm make ? and would it be possible to put the 58 on a SONY DSC P92 ?
|
|
|
06-23-2005, 01:11 PM
|
#26
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France - Alsace
Posts: 1,311
|
the 58 is just hem ... bigger
It's exactly the same in fact, and if the specific adapter was made for a 33mm, a 58 wouldn't fit
BTW, my adapter will be delivered tomorrow, sony is maybe expensive but damn fast, delivery by UPS in one day (I checked the "regular delivery" box though :shock: )
|
|
|
06-23-2005, 02:17 PM
|
#27
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 319
|
Originally Posted by Darkel
the 58 is just hem ... bigger
It's exactly the same in fact, and if the specific adapter was made for a 33mm, a 58 wouldn't fit
BTW, my adapter will be delivered tomorrow, sony is maybe expensive but damn fast, delivery by UPS in one day (I checked the "regular delivery" box though :shock: )
|
yea that's quick, I just ordered the Sony adaptor @ german onlineshop, €39 including shippingcost
still haven't made up my mind where to order the filters, will customs f*ck me if I have it shipped from the US ?
|
|
|
06-23-2005, 02:32 PM
|
#28
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
If the declared value is higher than the max limit, yes you will need to pay the custom fee. Here the limit for something bought from a store is something like 60 USD
__________________
|
|
|
06-23-2005, 07:29 PM
|
#29
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
Originally Posted by TT
Yeah dingo, for most non-SLR cameras, 58 is the correct diameter. spank the lady next time you see her 
|
LOL.....I should get a call to come into the store today, but from what I remember her ass is not something I want to spank.
__________________
|
|
|
06-24-2005, 12:19 PM
|
#30
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
You can use a tool then
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|