04-12-2005, 06:43 PM
|
#16
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 30° 4' N 85° 35' W
Posts: 1,783
|
Dont like the whole front at all and the rear is a 50/50.
|
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 10:19 PM
|
#17
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: J-Town
Posts: 711
|
I like it! its better then the old model. Is that new XK on making TV comm.?
__________________
The power of GT- R
|
|
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 10:54 PM
|
#18
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 369
|
doesnt look too bad, but its not that nice either. the rear isnt wide enough though IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2005, 11:15 PM
|
#19
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
|
|
i like how that model doesnt have the drugdealer wheels of the showcar
|
you mean these?
i think they're the same design, just smaller and less detailed on the production version. the concept's were so expensive that Jag could only make four of them.
as for the car, it's gorgeous. i don't know why jaguar even bothered with making a concept that is almost identical.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2005, 12:57 AM
|
#20
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Managua, Nicaragua
Posts: 1,509
|
I like it...well it is a lot better than the current one. The front looks good, although I must say the front inlet would look better if it were a bit bigger, it would give it a more aggressive look.
The back looks very good, but those circles in the lighs look aweful, way too busy. I guess they're looking to modernize the brand, looking for a younger audience...which is good.
__________________
"You stick to building tractors and I will stick to building sports cars" -Enzo Ferrari to Ferruccio Lamborghini...
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2005, 03:26 AM
|
#21
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 161
|
it looks like a chevrolet from the front 
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2005, 01:22 PM
|
#22
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 461
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2005, 01:49 AM
|
#23
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
|
Originally Posted by Chaos in 1983!
I like it...well it is a lot better than the current one. The front looks good, although I must say the front inlet would look better if it were a bit bigger, it would give it a more aggressive look.
The back looks very good, but those circles in the lighs look aweful, way too busy. I guess they're looking to modernize the brand, looking for a younger audience...which is good.
|
I am thinking of the completely opposite. I like the front a lot, but I do not like the rear. It needs to be wider or something.
Overall very nice design.
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2005, 01:13 PM
|
#24
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
|
Anyone got the new EVO? Mr callum (i think) who designed the newer astons and this talks about it and its comparisons to the astons.
He makes a good point that actually the Astons are more like jags rather than vice versa if you go by previous models eg pre 90's - especially the E-type
|
|
|
|
|
04-18-2005, 11:11 AM
|
#25
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
|
hmm.. at first glance i thought of a Ford Taurus lookin at the front of that car..
is this based on the new aston martins?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-18-2005, 08:39 PM
|
#26
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
|
|
is this based on the new aston martins?
|
No, it'll be based on the new XJ platform, i believe. Aluminum power!
*all Aston Martins share the VH platform.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-21-2005, 07:59 AM
|
#27
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,562
|
not a big fan of the front at all! It is like an austin martin that has been hit with the ugly stick
__________________
Australia. JW Link to Down Under
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
