|
Originally Posted by blah
|
Originally Posted by itsthepham
|
Originally Posted by Mopsdrops
|
Originally Posted by blah
now just drop a turbo in.
|
yes i know, my dad and i where thinking also about the same thing. only a turbo costs much. and the car must also be better compression resisted then. maybe later whe could do it. |
eh. I dont believe in turbo charging hondas. I like hondas to be true to N/A. I think N/a is the best way to go anyways. Honda's arent meant to be turboed. :roll: |
yea they were, There is a civic hatch with a H22 engine in it, turbocharged it womps on WRXs. Thats going from like 17 seconds to 13/14. Also there is a S2000 around here turbocharged, it puts down 350-400 horses. There is also a supercharged S2K around here. That mother hauls ass. |
Jeezus. S2000's are really fast out of the box, I wouldn't mind taking an FI S2000 for a spin. Hondas should be N/A though. The whole philosophy behind Honda in the first place was to get big power out of small engines without using forced induction, hence the original Vtec and its descendents. FI kills engine response and reliability (which are two big Honda characteristics), not to mention adding a bit of weight to the car.
Linear Mode
