01-05-2004, 11:41 AM
|
#16
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 151
|
Don't think they've made a production Tomahawk. There's still talk, but none off the production line yet.
|
|
|
01-05-2004, 11:46 AM
|
#17
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
Yes , not yet off the production line but i read that they will do it in several magazines (from official sources) : a 25 production for 250 000 USD each but it won't be homologated for the road only for your garden !!
__________________
|
|
|
01-05-2004, 11:59 AM
|
#18
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
|
0-60 in 2.9 secs...how much G's is that ??
__________________
|
|
|
01-05-2004, 12:08 PM
|
#19
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
|
Vaporware. I will believe it when I see it. Kind of like the Bughatti Veryon. Anybody can claim, until they deliver assume they are blowing smoke.
|
|
|
01-05-2004, 12:47 PM
|
#20
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 438
|
i got it at around .95 Gs.
|
|
|
01-05-2004, 11:53 PM
|
#21
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 153
|
well the chassis is the most important part of the car, hehe if mclaren came in
but w/o a good chassis its going to be a failure (as in slower than zonda, enzo, cgt)
__________________
Drive it like you stole it.
|
|
|
01-06-2004, 12:52 PM
|
#22
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 151
|
Concept/Prototype is just semantics now. The only reason they qualify it is a "prototype" is because it was designed on computer, meaning that they could transfer to manufacturing. They even hinted at it being merely an "engineering excercise" by stating that the car is still important to Chrysler even if they don't build it.
The only factor between prototype and production is the simple question: Will anybody (in significant numbers) shell out $400,000+ for a Chrysler?
|
|
|
01-06-2004, 09:58 PM
|
#23
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 44
|
It looks cool and sounds cool, but Chrysler will probably screw it up. It needs AWD though.
__________________
1987 Mercedes 190E 2.3-16
|
|
|
01-06-2004, 11:22 PM
|
#24
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: toronto,
Posts: 2,393
|
looks cool if it does not have the chryslter badge
it think it pretty much will kill any car on the road in the straight
cars are getting more ridiculus,, alot of supercars are now over 600hp
i think all these supercar war started with enzo,, not every company just want to beat enzo
i heard the new generation of 575 will use the detuned version of the enzo engine
same as the next 360 or the updated version
and currently 616 is using detuned version of the enzo
__________________
ferrari freak
i am a porn addict
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|