Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2004, 11:41 AM   #16
sickx
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 151
Default

Don't think they've made a production Tomahawk. There's still talk, but none off the production line yet.
sickx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 11:46 AM   #17
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

Yes , not yet off the production line but i read that they will do it in several magazines (from official sources) : a 25 production for 250 000 USD each but it won't be homologated for the road only for your garden !!
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 11:59 AM   #18
Fleischmann
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
Default

0-60 in 2.9 secs...how much G's is that ??
__________________
Fleischmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 12:08 PM   #19
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default

Vaporware. I will believe it when I see it. Kind of like the Bughatti Veryon. Anybody can claim, until they deliver assume they are blowing smoke.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 12:47 PM   #20
godspeed06
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 438
Default

i got it at around .95 Gs.
godspeed06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 11:53 PM   #21
Ivanhoe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 153
Default

well the chassis is the most important part of the car, hehe if mclaren came in

but w/o a good chassis its going to be a failure (as in slower than zonda, enzo, cgt)
__________________
Drive it like you stole it.
Ivanhoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 12:52 PM   #22
sickx
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 151
Default

Concept/Prototype is just semantics now. The only reason they qualify it is a "prototype" is because it was designed on computer, meaning that they could transfer to manufacturing. They even hinted at it being merely an "engineering excercise" by stating that the car is still important to Chrysler even if they don't build it.

The only factor between prototype and production is the simple question: Will anybody (in significant numbers) shell out $400,000+ for a Chrysler?
sickx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 09:58 PM   #23
kiato4
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 44
Default

It looks cool and sounds cool, but Chrysler will probably screw it up. It needs AWD though.
__________________
1987 Mercedes 190E 2.3-16
kiato4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 11:22 PM   #24
twboy1999
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: toronto,
Posts: 2,393
Default

looks cool if it does not have the chryslter badge

it think it pretty much will kill any car on the road in the straight

cars are getting more ridiculus,, alot of supercars are now over 600hp

i think all these supercar war started with enzo,, not every company just want to beat enzo

i heard the new generation of 575 will use the detuned version of the enzo engine

same as the next 360 or the updated version
and currently 616 is using detuned version of the enzo
__________________
ferrari freak
i am a porn addict
twboy1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump