08-03-2004, 12:46 PM
|
#136
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
Originally Posted by LotusGT1
Originally Posted by T-Bird
So Lotus you like to get your facts straight then why did you state that the Exige got .4 seconds faster than the C6 when in fact the Exige got a 1.26.9 and the C6 1.26.8
|
Wow, the list on page one clearly states 1.26.4 :roll:
|
WOW that whole list is fucked up that has been stated a few times now if you watch the fucking show and look at the list the Exige is listed at 1.26.9 right below the 1.26.8 of the C6 bitch.
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 12:49 PM
|
#137
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Originally Posted by RC45
LOL I guess so
BTW, another MAJOR point why Vettes always sold well here and always will probably: displacement... 6 liters... hell YES!!  gas prices here are cheap! Even a 3.6 Porsche and anything below 2 liters is for pussy's//  - but a 6 liters will attract MANY potential buyers right away...
 - Couldn't resist the rewrite sir.. 
|
HAHA  no prob  as I said, we are just different, both people and laws/prices and so on
Nobody has the right to say who is "better" as there is no "better" field
Hell my dream is to live in the depth of Alaska and have the biggest Suburban ever  who cares it is does 0.05 MPG
__________________
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 12:54 PM
|
#138
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Originally Posted by LotusGT1
Read for crying out loud.
You claimed the Z06 beat the GT3 on the Ring - FALSE, it never did. It possibly could, but it has never been proven. Do you know under what conditions the GT3's time was set ? You don't have to explain me the importance of drivers and conditions, I never disputed that, did I ? LOL, I even agreed with you.
I wasn't the one that kept comparing the C6 with the GT3, but since some dipshits don't pay attention and think the GT3's TG time was on a dry circuit, instead of soaking wet, that's how the GT3 got into this discussion.
|
Sure - I engaged in Jeremy Clarkson hyperbole for one sentence.. so sue me. I said "beat" instead of "equalled".
The 2004 Z06 has lapped the Nurburgring in 7:56 - a time EQUAL to a popular posted GT3 time.
So I said "beat" instead of "equal" - big whoop.
Originally Posted by LotusGT1
Of course I'm aware the GT3 is a stripped down hardcore 911.
|
No shit Sherlock - but you still insisted on this juvenile response
Nevertheless, calling a Porsche 911 GT3 a limited-edition, hand-made, premiere, no-holds-barred, no-expense-sparred, trimmed-down, light-weight, racer-wannabe uber-sportscar is comical, and couldn't be farther from the truth. Childish might be a better word.
|
Perhaps you are confused about what "couldn't be further from the truth" means... :roll: Here's a link you may find of use http://www.dictionary.com/
Originally Posted by LotusGT1
So learn how to fucking read or shut up, you're getting tiresome.
|
You were never anything but. :roll:
If you could comprehensively read english, you would have realised you snapped when you misread one of my previous comments. And there is no fucking way I will back down for a Dutchie now - never did while I was growing up and certainly won't start now.
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 01:00 PM
|
#139
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
|
Originally Posted by T-Bird
WOW that whole list is fucked up that has been stated a few times now if you watch the fucking show and look at the list the Exige is listed at 1.26.9 right below the 1.26.8 of the C6 bitch.
|
Tone down, it is easy to be confused...
You calling me a bitch, now that is funny....
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 01:06 PM
|
#140
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
|
Originally Posted by RC45
Sure - I engaged in Jeremy Clarkson hyperbole for one sentence.. so sue me. I said "beat" instead of "equalled".
The 2004 Z06 has lapped the Nurburgring in 7:56 - a time EQUAL to a popular posted GT3 time.
So I said "beat" instead of "equal" - big whoop.
|
I just said you were wrong. You snapped at that, not me...
Originally Posted by RC45
No shit Sherlock - but you still insisted on this juvenile response
|
WTF ? Who fucking brought the whole car into this discussion ?
Originally Posted by RC45
Perhaps you are confused about what "couldn't be further from the truth" means... :roll: Here's a link you may find of use http://www.dictionary.com/
|
You probably looked up the definition of handling on that site...well done.
But enlighten me, since when is a GT3 a racer-wannabe ?
Originally Posted by RC45
You were never anything but. :roll:
If you could comprehensively read english, you would have realised you snapped when you misread one of my previous comments. And there is no fucking way I will back down for a Dutchie now - never did while I was growing up and certainly won't start now. 
|
I never misread anything, and I didn't snap. You just don't like it when somebody corrects you. I'd care less though....
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 01:25 PM
|
#141
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
|
Originally Posted by RC45
BTW, another MAJOR point why Vettes always sold well here and always will probably: displacement... 6 liters... hell YES!!  gas prices here are cheap! Even a 3.6 Porsche and anything below 2 liters is for pussy's//  - but a 6 liters will attract MANY potential buyers right away...
|
Well if your gonna put a 6 litre in a car, you may as well get a decent power output
Power per litere of a GT3: 107bhp
Power per litre of a C6: 67bhp
Assuming the new Z06 will have 500bhp
Power per litre will be about 83bhp
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 01:47 PM
|
#142
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Originally Posted by mindgam3
Originally Posted by RC45
BTW, another MAJOR point why Vettes always sold well here and always will probably: displacement... 6 liters... hell YES!!  gas prices here are cheap! Even a 3.6 Porsche and anything below 2 liters is for pussy's//  - but a 6 liters will attract MANY potential buyers right away...
|
Well if your gonna put a 6 litre in a car, you may as well get a decent power output
Power per litere of a GT3: 107bhp
Power per litre of a C6: 67bhp
Assuming the new Z06 will have 500bhp
Power per litre will be about 83bhp
|
That is a s good as a signed application to Ricer 101..
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 01:53 PM
|
#143
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 263
|
Originally Posted by mindgam3
Originally Posted by RC45
BTW, another MAJOR point why Vettes always sold well here and always will probably: displacement... 6 liters... hell YES!!  gas prices here are cheap! Even a 3.6 Porsche and anything below 2 liters is for pussy's//  - but a 6 liters will attract MANY potential buyers right away...
|
Well if your gonna put a 6 litre in a car, you may as well get a decent power output
Power per litere of a GT3: 107bhp
Power per litre of a C6: 67bhp
Assuming the new Z06 will have 500bhp
Power per litre will be about 83bhp
|
You know a model airplane has even better hp/L than any porsche or ferrari, or other "high tech" motor you can bring up.
I guess I'll swap one of those beauties into my vette :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 01:56 PM
|
#144
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
Oh who gives a crap about hp/liter were getting into ricer terms here and let's look at the torgue of the two:
C6: 400 (you don't get that out of a 3.6)
GT3: 285
and GT3 has all that fancy veriable valve timing and shit and the LS2 uses Pushrods that explains a little.
(not saying Pushrods are bad)
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 01:56 PM
|
#145
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
|
Point is ?
__________________
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 01:58 PM
|
#146
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
|
lol, sorry did i touch a nerve there you two?
It just shows how under-developed the engine is compared to a decent car
Originally Posted by RC45
That is a s good as a signed application to Ricer 101..
|
lol, meaning what exactly?
How is stating some facts about a car "getting into ricer terms"
The torque is only so much because its a large displacement engine. That's just natural, there isn't much to rave about there....
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 02:01 PM
|
#147
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
|
under-developed ? It does what it has to do.
__________________
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 02:02 PM
|
#148
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
the point is who gives a flying fuck about hp/ltr?
Oh that's right Ricers!
If you know anything about what makes a car go it's called Torque and that seems to be something that the GT3 doesn't have, or many Porsches for that fact.
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 02:04 PM
|
#149
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Nope, also Swiss ppl gives a crap about it  too many cubic centimeters causes higher takes  so a hypedout 500 cc engine boosting out those 400 hp would be ideal here
__________________
|
|
|
08-03-2004, 02:05 PM
|
#150
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
|
Originally Posted by TT
Nope, also Swiss ppl gives a crap about it  too many cubic centimeters causes higher takes  so a hypedout 500 cc engine boosting out those 400 hp would be ideal here 
|
Yes, I know the GT3 doesn't go. The car laps the 'Ring in 7:54...but you're right, it doesn't go :roll:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|