12-23-2003, 11:36 AM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Estonia
Posts: 431
|
Test between gti,sierra cosworth,pontiac and more.
__________________
|
|
|
|
12-23-2003, 12:05 PM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 438
|
i didn't think the firebird would be so slow. 0-62mph in 7.4 seconds? wtf? still had a fast (err.. faster) lap time though.
|
|
|
|
|
12-23-2003, 12:47 PM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,668
|
Damn shame I don't understand it but still thx for posting! Interesting article (even if I can only understand the figures)
|
|
|
|
|
12-24-2003, 03:53 PM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 36
|
Too bad the MR2 wasnt turbo. I had a 91 turbo and it would do 0-60 in 6 seconds flat.
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2004, 10:11 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
|
nice article and same in finnish kiva artikkeli 
|
|
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 04:52 PM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 101
|
Imre: do u have more articles. Nice to see other Finns here 8)
TM artikkelilt jakoon!
|
|
|
|
|
01-10-2004, 02:03 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
|
I do believe the firebird is the v6 version. Thus the time is not a shock.
The v8 runs a sub 5 0-60(Id guess 4.7 but I forget the exact number).
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
