Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-24-2004, 12:04 PM   #16
Tumbler
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 55
Default

manual version

there wont be a turbo but they are bringing out a rx7 turbo one day

everso u have no idea shut up
Tumbler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2004, 04:04 PM   #17
Schwalbe
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,455
Default

^^^^^^
have you driven one?
I'm sure like you everso that he never driven any RX8.

You will be happy everso to knowledge that the Audi TT possesses a bigger “Maximum cargo volume” than the Mazda RX8.

2004 Audi TT 1.8L 2dr Front-wheel Drive FrontTrak Coupe
Maximum Cargo Volume: 24.2cu.ft.

2004 Mazda RX-8 Sport Automatic 4dr Coupe
Maximum Cargo Volume: 7.6 cu.ft.

For people who don’t believe me:

http://www.carsdirect.com/research/m...matic/features
http://www.carsdirect.com/research/a...4/18l/features
Schwalbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2004, 11:45 AM   #18
inese
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Schwalbe JG 44
^^^^^^
have you driven one?
I'm sure like you everso that he never driven any RX8.

You will be happy everso to knowledge that the Audi TT possesses a bigger “Maximum cargo volume” than the Mazda RX8.

2004 Audi TT 1.8L 2dr Front-wheel Drive FrontTrak Coupe
Maximum Cargo Volume: 24.2cu.ft.

2004 Mazda RX-8 Sport Automatic 4dr Coupe
Maximum Cargo Volume: 7.6 cu.ft.

For people who don’t believe me:

http://www.carsdirect.com/research/m...matic/features
http://www.carsdirect.com/research/a...4/18l/features
it's kind of hard to believe, I mean TT having 24 cu. ft. If I recall correctly BMW 3 sedan has something like 11 cu. ft
inese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2004, 12:52 PM   #19
Schwalbe
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,455
Default

^^^^ Perhaps it's because the seats is folded, and remember a TT is a hatchback car's.
Schwalbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2004, 07:20 PM   #20
peacenriot69
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NEW YORK USA
Posts: 87
Default

Although it may be a minor point as in racing gas cost is just the cost of doing business, but Seeing as though the Rx-8 is also a rotary engine it naturally consumes more gas than the I-4 of the audi the audi is more efficent on the gas mileage. once again although a minor point a point none the less.
__________________
Theres a Difference Between knowing the Path < And walking the path -Matrix-
peacenriot69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump