04-18-2006, 03:06 PM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,600
|
Spy shots: Ford Focus RS
|
|
|
04-18-2006, 03:40 PM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Zutphen, The Netherlands
Posts: 654
|
I already read about this news in the newspaper this morning. I think it is good news Ford is finally building an RS as they have already promised of the Focus Mk1. However this new RS isn't released yet, so they could do the old RS trick again and we end up with a 2wd 250bhp car instead of a 4wd 300bhp rally car....
|
|
|
04-19-2006, 06:52 AM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 948
|
St is really good car. Rs would be better. Can't wait...
__________________
|
|
|
04-20-2006, 05:52 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 510
|
Finally was wondering where this was when they released the ST. 300BHP and 4WD, the Golf R32 Only has 250BHP with 4WD so this things gonna blow its doors off.
__________________
|
|
|
04-20-2006, 05:55 PM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancaster,CA,US
Posts: 389
|
if only they would give us that one in america, still cant believe we have the old chasis over here, and they wonder why they are not selling them. :roll:
__________________
In a Porsche 911, you're going to have a very good time actually driving the thing, but everyone is going to hate you. They're going to give you dirty looks as you drive by, call you names at the lights, vandalise your paintwork in the night and never, ever let you out of a side turning. That's a given.
In the Vantage, everyone's going to want your babies.
-J.C.
|
|
|
04-20-2006, 06:13 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 383
|
Ford is rumoured to be considering a 350bhp, four-wheel-drive, six-cylinder turbocharged proposal for the next-generation Focus RS.
Three different versions of the engine are planned: a base naturally aspirated 3.2-litre and a pair of performance-oriented turbocharged 3.0-litre units. The former receives variable cam timing (VCT) on the inlet valves, with the latter two adopting a system operating both the inlet and exhaust valves as well as a variable-vane Garrett turbocharger.
In 3.2-litre guise, the new six-cylinder produces 235bhp at 6000rpm along with 236lb ft of torque at 3500rpm – an increase of 38bhp and 26lb ft over Volvo’s current 2.9-litre engine. The turbocharged units deliver 285bhp and 295lb ft in light-pressure guise, with the high-pressure unit pumping out a BMW M3-beating 350bhp and 332lb ft.
It’s this latter specification that Ford’s Motorsport boss, Jost Capito, may use to thrust the Blue Oval back to the very top of the European hot-hatch ranks. If Ford’s plans come to fruition, the new RS will boast a whopping 133bhp and 96lb ft more than the upcoming Focus ST, whose turbocharged 2.5-litre five-cylinder engine generates 217bhp along with 236lb ft of torque.
|
__________________
When someone is giving you his opinion, you should receive it with deep gratitude even though it is worthless.
|
|
|
04-21-2006, 09:57 AM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
|
This better be AWD with atleast 300hp...
__________________
|
|
|
04-21-2006, 11:21 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 875
|
the specs dont seem bad, but I still think the car is ugly.
__________________
|
|
|
04-22-2006, 03:41 AM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rotterdam, Holland, EU
Posts: 3,767
|
i like it  this car is way overdue, glad they're finally making it...but 6 cylinders would ruin everything indeed, stick to the rally heritage and make it 4  also im not sure if a 6 cylinder engine wouldnt be way too heavy...with car mags complaining about understeer and a heavy nose in the focuses with 5cylinder engines, would the 4WD make up for enough to compensate the extra weight?
__________________
|
|
|
04-22-2006, 05:50 AM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,418
|
Hot hatches are always welcome, a good car to use every day but with a little more punch
__________________
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 12:13 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Genève
Posts: 451
|
Originally Posted by Ronin005
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
6-cylinders??  quite dissapointing to be honest...
I thought they would use a 2.0... or 2.5 at most, 4-pot turbocharged engine, just like the rallyecar, or the Lancer Evo or the Impreza STi - a 6-cylinder makes this car a hatch for posers, like the 130i or the R32 - not a real racing-focused type of car 
|
couldnt of said it any better!!
6banger will ruin everything about the car!! 2.0 or 2.5l the max and 4 bangger only!!
|
Not over 2.0 for me
I am sure it will be a great car, but this is not what should be built using the WRC image to sell :x
|
|
|
04-25-2006, 01:35 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 510
|
3.2 liters well i guess it doesn't really stick to the tradition of hot hatches, small fun to drive cars which have a very sensible fuel consumption fugures. But i guess Ford want to build the ultimate hatch and bo does it look good with the ST body kit.
__________________
|
|
|
10-21-2006, 01:27 AM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,600
|
** Bump **
New pics - Oct. 20, '06
 
|
|
|
10-21-2006, 06:12 PM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 498
|
Originally Posted by McLaren4eVa
But i guess Ford want to build the ultimate hatch
|
Even if that was the case it surely won't be a match for the upcoming RS3 which it will be in the firing line of.
Although, it'll probably be alot cheaper!!
|
|
|
10-21-2006, 06:13 PM
|
#15
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
|
Hope they will make. Looking at how the ST is, this will certainly be a stunning car
__________________
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|