Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-26-2008, 07:19 PM   #26
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

Originally Posted by MidEngine4Life View Post
1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Int (auto) 11.4
1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais Quad 442 7.7
1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais Int. HO Quad 4 7.5
1993 Oldsmobile Cutlass Conv. 8.5

2006 Scion TC Sport Coupe 6.9 (R&T Jan '06)

lol sorry i said i was finished, but like I said i didnt buy it for speed. I could have bought a V12 BMW 8 series for less as well or one of many other cars that are faster and cost less

Anyway I cant wait to see the official photos of this "Genesis"
Since this thread, I started receiving R&T myself. I ran accross the testing summaries and noticed that the TC that ran 0-60 in 6.9 was the 200 hp supercharged TRD model. Does this describe your car? Somehow yours looks to have the standard 161hp/162lb-ft drivetrain.

So to clarify, the top of the line supercharged performance edition TC competes with the secretary variety Mustang (atleast in a straight line.)

Sport Compact Car enthusiastically tested the normal TC as going from 0-60 in 7.8

It seems that my initial Oldsmobile comparison was appropriate after all.

One last update, the 3.8 litre engines in '88 had 166 hp and 210 lb-ft of torque. This would be good for run of under 8 seconds given that the comparable Olds with the less capable 3.3 litre (contrary to what I said earlier, the 3.3 does actually have less hp and torque than the 1988 3.8) managed an 8 flat.
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump