|
Originally Posted by saadie
|
Originally Posted by davide
|
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
|
Originally Posted by JoeHahn
|
Originally Posted by RC45
|
Originally Posted by ae86_16v
|
Originally Posted by JoeHahn
|
Originally Posted by saadie
^^ wo0t .. double post lol ....
sooo the veyron is nothing more then a ricer's dream ? .. right ?
|
It brakes and handles well  |
104ft from 60-0mph is pretty damn good. 0.96g isn't bad either. |
.96 G is not worth a million dollars.. and neither is 104ft 60-0 braking
Sports cars have been doing that for 10 years now. |
2 tonne GT cars havent, however. |
I don't think the veyron is meant as a GT car. |
What would you call it? A sportscar? |
status symbol  |
Status symbol is pretty accurate actually. I used the word "meant" because I think VWs intention with this car was to make the ultimate sportscar, otherwise I don't understand why they always compare it with the Macca. Unfortunately it turned out overweight and unfocused. I have a very hard time seeing the Veyron being used as a GT car with hardly any luggage space and all it's other problems. If i was in the situation of buying a GT I'd much rather have a Conti GT, CL or a 6-series. Then I would have some money left to spend on a proper sportscar like a Zonda F or something similar.
Threaded Mode