Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-02-2005, 08:11 AM   #16
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

Originally Posted by crayzayjay
I disagree. Merc's products are all highly competent. They just need to produce them better, it's not an impossible task. Volume = Economies of scale. Maybe Merc should be using joint ventures & partnerships in a better way
Errr... economies of scale is meant to create profitability, but the drawback is that it compromises quality control.

Ronin005 is absolutely right. Mercedes's main draw WAS their perceived quality, not the amount of products they had on offer. Trying to find a niche and fill it in with a product in order to reap financial benefits is the sort of strategy that a volume-based manufacturer would do. You cannot control quality with that many products as well as you can with just a few, which is Porsche's approach.

Mercedes has lost a lot of class because of the products they have on offer. Vaneo? Vanio? A-class? B-class? R-class? All unclassy milk-van vehicles, and Mercedes is supposes to be classy.

If anything, Mercedes should only have a C, E, S, SLK, CLK, and SL... maybe a CL. Then all the volume vehicles (Vaneo, etc.) should be produced under a different brand, in order to prevent erosion to the Mercedes marque, especially since those vehicle's level of quality is so far below the expected standard.
__________________
Studio Gecko
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump