Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2004, 02:16 PM   #1
a007apl
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brasília-DF Brazil
Posts: 15,357
Default First Test: 2004 Lamborghini Gallardo

Vicious coupling: Italy and Germany join forces to produce a significant new exotic

By Chris Walton
Photography by Winston Goodfellow
Motor Trend, November 2003

Lamborghini's heritage is one of producing powerful V-12 engines wrapped in fantastic, often outrageous sheetmetal that makes the car look as potent as it is. Audi's current reputation is based on sleek, serious, all-wheel-drive sedans with interior designs as handsome as they are functional. If Audi or Lamborghini alone were to produce a new, compact exotic, either car would be newsworthy. When the two come together (Lamborghini is owned by Volkswagen under the auspices of Audi) to produce a single car combining each company's strengths, the result is a new-era supercar with the ferocity of a Lamborghini and the polish of an Audi: The 2004 Gallardo with 495 horsepower, all-wheel drive, and a body that'll trip even the most jaded Beverly hillbilly right out of his Ermenegildo Zegnas.

advertisement

In October, Executive Editor Matt Stone wrote a comprehensive "First Drive" of the Gallardo after having put the spurs to the (4961cc) V-10-powered "baby Lambo" on a racetrack. (For his impressions, as well as all the background and details of the car's design elements and manufacture, please read that story.) Now, we'll tell you a little more about the Gallardo's objective abilities--but only a little. Why the disclaimer? We had a quick, surreptitious chance to strap our test gear to a Gallardo, but the conditions were less than ideal, and the data only hint at what a proper test will yield.
In the first annual Giro Gallardo, Lamborghini enthusiasts from around the country were treated to a police escort from San Francisco's City Hall to the Golden Gate Bridge. Yes, we got to run red lights.
Ron Kimball photo

Perhaps the most striking thing about the Gallardo is the car's ultra-cab-forward silhouette and its relative scale. It's difficult to gauge from these pretty photos, but the Gallardo's wheelbase, at just 100.8 inches, is exactly the same as a Mercedes-Benz SL500's. The SL, however, is more than nine inches longer from stem to stern, five inches taller, and three inches narrower overall. Also, the Mercedes-Benz weighs an additional 500-plus pounds. The Gallardo isn't a big car, despite its sexy shape and deceptive family resemblance to the larger Murcielago.

Being the little brother in the Lamborghini lineup doesn't make the Gallardo any less a performer. You might be surprised that the capabilities of the two Lambos are, at least on paper, strikingly similar. In terms of specific output (horsepower produced per liter of engine displacement), the Gallardo edges out the Murcielago with its 99.8 horsepower/liter versus 92.2. Better yet, the Gallardo's power-to-weight ratio (how many pounds of car each horsepower propels) is effectively identical to the Murc's at 6.4 pounds/horsepower. Still, none of this tells you what great road manners the Gallardo has, how nice it is to drive, and how easily it gobbles miles.

Our recently recorded acceleration and braking figures are those of a high-mileage, preproduction Gallardo, with two people and their luggage aboard on a hot day. This well-worn test car was equipped with Lamborghini e-gear, the company's own version of a Magneti Marelli electro-hydraulically shifted six-speed manual transmission. Past experience has shown these systems less than perfect in delivering an optimal launch; however, their redline upshifts never miss a beat and might make up for the soft launch (if you could call it that with nearly 500 horsepower onboard).


The eye in the sky doesn't lie, and with our Racepak GPS test equipment, we recorded a 0-60-mph blast of 4.7 seconds and 100 mph arrived at 11.0. Lamborghini's factory estimate is 4.2 seconds to 60. By way of sibling comparison, our best Murcielago runs to 60 and 100 mph have been 3.5 and 8.4 seconds, respectively. Standing on the brake pedal from 60 mph brought the Gallardo to a halt in 114 feet--three feet longer than the Murcielago's 111-foot best. We can safely say these numbers will improve with a production car under our usual testing regimen at our normal test track.

Does all this mean the $165,900 Lamborghini is a better car than the company's $280,000 beloved flagship? Not necessarily, but it does mean that there's a new, more reasonably priced, impeccably built competitor prepared to get in the face of a $172,000 Ferrari 360 Modena, Porsche's $180,000 911 GT2, and the all-American Ford GT (set to land in the high $140s). Full test numbers--and major exotic group road trip--to follow.

advertisement


2004 Lamborghini Gallardo
Vehicle layout Mid-engine, awd, 2-door, 2-pass, coupe
Engine type 5.0L 90° V-10
Max horsepower @ rpm 495 @ 7800
Max torque @ rpm 376 @ 4500
Specific output, hp/liter 99.8
Power-to-weight, lb/hp 6.4
0-60 mph, sec 4.7
0-100 mph, sec 11.0
1/4 mile, sec @ mph 13.08 @ 109.89
Top speed, mph 192 (est)
Braking, 60-0 mph, ft 114
Base price $165,900
Price as tested $172,000 (est)
On sale in U.S. Currently
a007apl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 02:58 PM   #2
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

Thank you for the test, nice to post it but isn't it available on Motor Trend site ?
In this case you could have post the link
However, thanks again.
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 04:30 PM   #3
DMbaseball1604
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 650
Default

Thanks for the post, I really like this car as far as performance and everything and the looks are great until you see the back...in my opinion. I just think the back looks a bit like a box or something. But this is still a great great car that has outstanding performance!
DMbaseball1604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 05:57 PM   #4
a007apl
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brasília-DF Brazil
Posts: 15,357
Default

Originally Posted by yg60m
Thank you for the test, nice to post it but isn't it available on Motor Trend site ?
In this case you could have post the link
However, thanks again.
Because its a small report, if i found big i add the link
a007apl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 07:25 PM   #5
mhn3773
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: California
Posts: 341
Default

thanks for the article makes for some good reading
mhn3773 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 07:28 PM   #6
zevolv
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 865
Default

It's a good article I have that issue of Motor Trend
__________________
Blah Blah Blah! Ra! Ra! Ra!
zevolv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 08:31 PM   #7
dylan99
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 592
Default

I already saw this
__________________
Dream as if you'll live forever; live as if you'll die tomorrow - James Dean
dylan99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump