Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2004, 04:04 PM   #1
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default Stealth Enzo ...

On the french magazine "Sport Auto", i red an interresting article.
The police closed a motorway and clocked some fast cars with speed cameras. They measure a Porsche 996 Gt2 at 318 km/h but couldn't measure the speed of the Enzo, they used two differents speed cameras but no results and the policeman said they could not use a laser gun for this type of speed. It seems the pointed and low nose and shape + important speed are "guilty".
By checking the on board computer they achieved to get the max : 353 km/h. 8)
morals : If you want to make speed, take an Enzo and don't stop at 200 km/h you would be taken, push to 350 km/h ...
(Sorry, I haven't a scanner so I can't put it, but as it's in french, only a few would have understand)
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 04:29 PM   #2
Sam P
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Posts: 37
Default

Hmm, on-board speedometers aren't always accurate. That's why during road tests they use a radar gun to test top speed. But like you said, in this situation the radar gun couldn't clock it, either.
Sam P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 04:46 PM   #3
pimrusis
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Media, Pa
Posts: 515
Default

I thought they used GPS to clock top speed.
pimrusis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 04:53 PM   #4
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

I think every mag has his own methods.. some still uses the laser pointed on the ground afaik
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 04:54 PM   #5
corvette97
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 1,489
Default

maybe they use performance timers like beltronics vector fx, or this are not acurrate?
__________________
Current cars: Audi A4 3.slow +Subaru STI + Mitsu Montero
corvette97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 05:30 PM   #6
scubywrxr
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 644
Default

GPS is the cheapest and most accurate speed measurement device
scubywrxr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 05:30 PM   #7
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

For this event, the magazine wasn't there to record the speed. It was the police that wanted to test their material under extremes conditions so thet used the radars like you can find on the board of te roads ...
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2004, 11:40 AM   #8
sickx
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 151
Default

I would just calibrate my eyeballs and guess the speed--isn't that more accurate?
sickx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 01:19 PM   #9
amenasce
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Paris/Ny
Posts: 36
Default

yeah that issue was nice ! a stretch of highway closed for the soll purpose of speeding...
amenasce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 01:26 PM   #10
SFDMALEX
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,337
Default

Originally Posted by Sam P
Hmm, on-board speedometers aren't always accurate. That's why during road tests they use a radar gun to test top speed. But like you said, in this situation the radar gun couldn't clock it, either.
There is a digital speedo on the car which is accurate. They didnt take the reading from the analog gauge.
SFDMALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 01:47 PM   #11
HoboPie
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Posts: 385
Default

That still isn't necessarily accurate. I remember reading a TVR test recently and the GPS, digital readout, and analogue all had drastically different readings. The digital wasn't as drastic as the analogue, but it was still quite a bit off.
__________________
Formerly known as SG Blade.
HoboPie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 08:07 PM   #12
dylan99
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 592
Default

Originally Posted by thamar
Most accurate of'm all is time vs distance.
It is difficult to say wich is the best but your method is a math solution and to my opinion it is the best way (very accurate). Technology isn't always 100% sure.
__________________
Dream as if you'll live forever; live as if you'll die tomorrow - James Dean
dylan99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 11:40 AM   #13
espen
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 171
Default

I'd say GPS is the mist reliable solution on a cost vs compexity comparo. Sure, you could devise some clever solution that takes into account tire wear and everything and gives an accurate reading - or you could just go and buy a £499 Race Technology DL90. All the data you could possibly want for half a G.
espen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 12:22 PM   #14
LotusGT1
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
Default

I remember Topgear doing a feature somewhat like that, about which speed you'd need to outrun a speeding camera. They couldn't do it with a Mercedes CL55 @ 250 kph, but they did succeed using a TVR Tuscan S going around 270 kph...
__________________
LotusGT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump