Originally Posted by gucom
yeah started watching it, you know, trying to do the whole "unbiased, hear both points of view" thing, but i stopped after hearing the guy say the environmentalists have an anti-human agenda... :roll:
|
then what agenda do they have? you remember back in the 80's and 90's when it was CFC's and the Ozone layer?
how about the politics of fear in the 70's when they said the oceans would rise 20 ft. by the eve of today? It is no different except most of them have removed time tables which we could possibly live into (100+ years) a true environmentalist wouldn't be concerned with GW prior to true polutants... the Hydrongen Sulfide, Sulfer Dioxide, and msc. particulate emmissions which have been proven to have an effect here, now today etc.
IMO, conservationalists are the true "environmentalist's" out there, while an unscientific backing and consensus has taken over the word "environmentalism"... Perhaps you shouldn't be so easily blinded by your own self loathing... extrapolating to being anti-humanist