07-26-2004, 02:29 PM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
|
Yet another digi camera question...
Right, this is the type of photograph I will mainly be taking. As you can see the camera my mate has, is not doing too good a job of it! The question is, do I have to spend a fortune on a digi camera to take 'action' pics? Any suggetions, I have no price in mind yet, (although, not a digi SLR...that would break the bank lol)
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 02:34 PM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
|
Probably firing the flash would help (reducing shutter speeds), but i think you will nead a highly adjustable camera with a very fast shutter
__________________
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 02:39 PM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
|
That sounds expensive  Never knew the flash increased shutter speed.
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 03:14 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
You need for sure a better camera than his one, no need for a shutter set at 1/2000, probably 1/640 or 1/800 sec will do. Problem is when there is not much light.. in such cases the pic risk to end up dark... of course the more expensive a camera the better in this case  but I'd say you need one where you can fiddle with shutter speed and diaphragm or whatever is called
__________________
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 03:24 PM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
yeah you will need a Very expensive SLR type Digital camera or a half that price high end film Camera like most professional sports photographers still use because of your exact problem cost.
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 03:41 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Or a "SLR-like" as I choosed  costing a bit less than the cheaper SLR cameras but still not to bad! Sadly I think it's already to much
__________________
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 04:14 PM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solihull - UK
Posts: 502
|
jon_s - What camera are you using ??
Looking at your photos you need to use a faster shutter speed, something like 1/250 - 1/320 should do. Also, make sure you follow (pan) your subject. As soon as they come into view start tracking them through the view finder, when they reach the 'target' zone press the shutter button but continue to track them. This will give you a sharp subject with a blurred background.
If you don't follow the subject you'll need a very high shutter speed of at least 1/1200 and you won't get blurred backgrounds.
__________________
|| Canon 20D x2 | 17-40L | 24-70L | 100 USM Macro | 100-400L IS | 580EX ||
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 04:26 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
|
Umm, I will find out what camera it was. The first pic is static, but the second is following the subject, it is better, but no where near what I want.
I will start looking for cameras with that shutter speed....
edit, it is this one I think:
http://tinyurl.com/5bfnq
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 04:32 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solihull - UK
Posts: 502
|
Most digital cameras have shutter speeds ranging from 15 sec to 1/2000 sec. It's just practice taking photos that you probably need.
__________________
|| Canon 20D x2 | 17-40L | 24-70L | 100 USM Macro | 100-400L IS | 580EX ||
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 04:36 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
|
hehe, not going to argue with that lol I could only see a 'sports' function on his camera, no shutter speed changer. Are there digi cameras taht you can change the shutter speed on?
edit: what about the second hand market?
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 04:40 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solihull - UK
Posts: 502
|
Does your camera have a 'Tv' or 'M' mode ?
__________________
|| Canon 20D x2 | 17-40L | 24-70L | 100 USM Macro | 100-400L IS | 580EX ||
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 04:42 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
|
It does not have the TV mode, I am not sure about 'M'
Edit, damn the Canon EOS 10D can take some amazing pics! Ok, it has a lot to do with the photographer too lol
**not 56k friendly, not even 512k friendly lol**
http://web.canon.jp/Imaging/EOS10D/d...nightscene.jpg
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 04:50 PM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solihull - UK
Posts: 502
|
Even with low end cameras you can still get good photos, it just takes practice
__________________
|| Canon 20D x2 | 17-40L | 24-70L | 100 USM Macro | 100-400L IS | 580EX ||
|
|
|
07-26-2004, 07:35 PM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Burst mode.
|
|
|
07-27-2004, 05:53 PM
|
#15
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,381
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|