05-17-2006, 03:45 PM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 510
|
Sounds great but my all time favourite AMG is the CLS.
__________________
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 03:54 PM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monterey(Home)/Irvine(School), California
Posts: 989
|
Mercedes-BANZ? Sounds like a rapper...haha I'm just giving you a hard time. Sounds awesome, I've ridden in the C32 many times and it was a very impressive car. If the spec. sheet for this car is correct, it should be one hell of a car that exponentially improves on the previous generation C-class AMG. Can't wait to see this beast on the streets!
__________________
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 04:15 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,600
|
Mercedes-BANZ? Sounds like a rapper.
|
whoops  ops:
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 04:33 PM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: slovenia, in my BMW
Posts: 1,465
|
The C klasse is gona eat the M3 and the RS4, but i dont care becouse i wouldnt take it if it was for free
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 04:58 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rocky Mountains, Colorado
Posts: 995
|
The price of this car will not be justified. You're paying fo the name and to say "look what I have". The car itsself isn't worth what dealers will charge.
The new M3 will be a much better performing car and a better "driver's car" even with 100 less hp than the C63. Not to mention the extreme cost difference advantage the M3 will have.
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 05:19 PM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
|
Quite curious.... the new C-class didn't even came out, and there's already a test mule of the AMG version
It will be a very good car, for sure, but without the passion of an M3 or an RS4 8)
__________________
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 08:54 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada BC
Posts: 1,084
|
Am I the only one finding it rather weird that MB is putting that engine in pretty much all the AMG cars? Not that there's anything wrong with it, but every line of cars they make that can fit the engine has or will have that engine in the near future.
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 09:52 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6
|
Who nows that it is a 63 AMG? It has 4 exhaust, and nice bodywork, but I don't think AMG will put something that heavy into such small car.
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 09:54 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
|
That's what they've done with the 55 AMG
That's Mercedes policy :roll:
__________________
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 09:55 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,590
|
Originally Posted by vbnhu
Who nows that it is a 63 AMG? It has 4 exhaust, and nice bodywork, but I don't think AMG will put something that heavy into such small car.
|
Ummm...then you'll be shocked to find out that they put it in the SLK!
__________________
"If we could read the secret histories of our enemies, we would find in each story enough sorrow and suffering to disarm all hostility." Longfellow
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 10:27 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6
|
They got rid of the kompressor, making it lighter and less powerfull for the C 55, but you are right, they could make another straight line cruiser. For completly different market than the M3 and RS4.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|