02-18-2006, 07:31 AM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
Official: Turbo is back - BMW
8)
306hk,400nm
BMW today released new details on its much-rumored N54 Bi-Turbo Engine. The motor is expected to appear in the 2007 BMW 335i and 2007 BMW 335ci (coupe). The engine has an output of 306 horsepower and maximum torque of 295 lbs.-ft (400 Nm). BMW said it has already tested a 3-Series sedan with the engine, and achieved a 0-62mph time of 5.7 seconds. BMW said the engine is relatively lightweight — about 70kg less than its 4.0-liter V8 engine. According to the automaker, the 3.0-liter engine has little or no turbo lag, thanks to two small turbos instead of one large one. Maximum torque is achieved between 1500 and 5800 rpm. What we know so far: BMW will show its new E92 3-Series coupe at the Geneva Motor Show along with this new engine. What's no entirely clear is whether this engine will make it to North America. Recent rumors suggested this turbo engine would be exclusive to Europe, and a different naturally-aspirated powerplant would drive the 335 in North America.
http://www.m5board.com/photopost/upl...579/Send01.jpg
http://www.m5board.com/photopost/upl...579/Send03.jpg
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/2082/send044ha.jpg
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/369/send027bh.jpg[/
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 07:39 AM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USSR ;)
Posts: 651
|
Wooohooo... !!! FINALLY after last Turbo BMW from Alpina...
Great NEWS!!! Thanx Just_me...
Awesome Engine + it's " about 70kg less than its 4.0-liter V8 engine"
V8 alluminium engine... No words. Should be best engine for 2007. 
Great potential for boostin
__________________
"No Matters How Hard You Try, You Can't Stop Us Now!" (c) RATM
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 07:54 AM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
According to the automaker, the 3.0-liter engine has little or no turbo lag
|
Are they not sure?
Propably a great engine but 306bhp from this bi-turbo doesn't sound that inspiring. Frankly I'm a little dissapointed. I'd rather have a NA 330Ci (if there's going to be one?). Only 0.6s slower to 100km/h and definetely no turbo lag.
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 08:05 AM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USSR ;)
Posts: 651
|
dissapointed ?! WTF ?! :shock: 306HP = just for selling. Like it was with Skyline's GT-R in Japan. Buy this car with 280HP and tune it to 400hp easily
Rise the boost and DIE with 400hp BMW
__________________
"No Matters How Hard You Try, You Can't Stop Us Now!" (c) RATM
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 08:15 AM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
Originally Posted by Igorionia
dissapointed ?! WTF ?! :shock: 306HP = just for selling. Like it was with Skyline's GT-R in Japan. Buy this car with 280HP and tune it to 400hp easilly
Rise the boost and DIE with 400hp BMW 
|
Yes but this is a factory car so that's what's relevant. BMW are well know for producing high reving engines with high output/volume. The C32 produced 354bhp with one supercharger from 3.2litre engine back in the days. I was expecting figures in the neighbourhood of 330-340bhp atleast. Only a rise with ~40bhp just doesn't impress me. For me it sound like and engine more fitted for the 5 and 7-series.
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 08:24 AM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USSR ;)
Posts: 651
|
well... anyway this engine got GREAT potential. like RS4/RS6 (Turbo engines), like GT2 engine and so on...
__________________
"No Matters How Hard You Try, You Can't Stop Us Now!" (c) RATM
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 01:59 PM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: slovenia, in my BMW
Posts: 1,465
|
this is a great news, but i too expected to be in the S4 range 340HP, but this will do  and the 0-100kph is good too
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 03:33 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Burlington, VT/Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 146
|
this isn't a real bi-turbo like the old audi s4 right? i thought this engine had one turbo for low RPM and the other for the higher end...not 2 for the whole range.
(100th post!)
__________________
Cleveland Rocks!
1995 Saab 900 Turbo
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 04:00 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
Originally Posted by lorbmw69
this isn't a real bi-turbo like the old audi s4 right? i thought this engine had one turbo for low RPM and the other for the higher end...not 2 for the whole range.
(100th post!)
|
I'm just guessing here but propably two turbos for different revs.
And if it has two turbos that makes is a "real" bi-turbo in any case. Guess what bi means
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 06:01 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
Instead of one big Turbo, this one have two small turbos. One for low rpm and one for higher rpm. I think it works the same as Toyota Supra?
400nm available between 1500-5800rpm. Redline begins at 7000rpm.
Tested in E90:
80-120kmh in 6.3s (eg. 330i in 8.2s)
0-100kmh in 5.7s (eg. 330i in 6.3s)
I bet from 0-200km/h, the turbo will cut the time by several seconds.
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 06:52 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 06:52 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
I bet from 0-200km/h, the turbo will cut the time by several seconds.
|
I'm quite sure of that too. ~45bhp more will definetely pay dividends.
A redline at 7000rpm sounds interesting for a turbo. At what rpm is max power?
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 07:00 PM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
I bet from 0-200km/h, the turbo will cut the time by several seconds.
|
I'm quite sure of that too. ~45bhp more will definetely pay dividends.
A redline at 7000rpm sounds interesting for a turbo. At what rpm is max power?
|
MAx torque is 400nm, available between 1500-5800rpm  or are you talking about HP?
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 07:04 PM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
Originally Posted by Just_me
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
I bet from 0-200km/h, the turbo will cut the time by several seconds.
|
I'm quite sure of that too. ~45bhp more will definetely pay dividends.
A redline at 7000rpm sounds interesting for a turbo. At what rpm is max power?
|
MAx torque is 400nm, available between 1500-5800rpm  or are you talking about HP?
|
Yes I'm talking about HP. The talk about power can be somewhat confusing for us swedes when we speak english. Why do manufacterers always talk about a flat torqe-curves nowadays. They are all doing it. Fact still reamins that you find a peak at some rpm no matter what.
|
|
|
02-18-2006, 07:11 PM
|
#15
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
Originally Posted by Just_me
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
I bet from 0-200km/h, the turbo will cut the time by several seconds.
|
I'm quite sure of that too. ~45bhp more will definetely pay dividends.
A redline at 7000rpm sounds interesting for a turbo. At what rpm is max power?
|
MAx torque is 400nm, available between 1500-5800rpm  or are you talking about HP?
|
Yes I'm talking about HP. The talk about power can be somewhat confusing for us swedes when we speak english. Why do manufacterers always talk about a flat torqe-curves nowadays. They are all doing it. Fact still reamins that you find a peak at some rpm no matter what.
|
Jag är också svensk
Har tyvärr inget svar på din fråga (I dont have an asnwer for you)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|