07-23-2005, 12:15 AM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brasília-DF Brazil
Posts: 15,357
|
Connection Test
|
|
|
|
07-23-2005, 12:35 AM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston but from Mty
Posts: 2,113
|
i got 891.51 kbps...
how good is that?
__________________
|
Originally Posted by TT
we have a superb community full of great friends always ready to face any kind of menace  .. and win of course |
Nuff Said
|
|
|
|
|
07-23-2005, 12:35 AM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Abilene, TX USA
Posts: 798
|
how accurate is it?
i got 675kbps. no even close of what i have.
|
|
|
|
|
07-23-2005, 12:55 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brasília-DF Brazil
Posts: 15,357
|
656.31 kbps
|
|
|
|
|
07-23-2005, 02:44 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
|
2089.69 kbps...pretty standard for a 2Mbit line
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-23-2005, 03:44 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Posts: 98
|
I got 2158.78 kbps with this test...
But with this web test I got 3,039.70 Kbps.
Don't know wich is more accurate 
|
|
|
|
|
07-23-2005, 04:25 AM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,184
|
|
Originally Posted by ravenpaua
I got 2158.78 kbps with this test...
But with this web test I got 3,039.70 Kbps.
Don't know wich is more accurate |
I got a little under 2000 in that test, 1,998.05 to be precise.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-23-2005, 05:30 AM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Genčve
Posts: 451
|
I tried a few times, with nothing else running, and the results ranged from 300 to 600
It should be around 600, but 300??? how did they get that result?
|
|
|
|
|
07-23-2005, 05:40 AM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Posts: 98
|
It depends of the bandwidth of your internet connection 
|
|
|
|
|
07-23-2005, 06:55 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brasília-DF Brazil
Posts: 15,357
|
Now 734.77 kbps 
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2005, 03:38 PM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Posts: 821
|
453.49 kbps
__________________
Mclaren, the best car of the world
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2005, 04:43 PM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 526
|
for european people this site might be better. Click on the speedo on the right
|
Originally Posted by Fleischmann
2089.69 kbps...pretty standard for a 2Mbit line
|
A 2mbit line?!?! What isp do you have? I'm thinking it's not TPSA...
Zig zag perhaps? I had them for a while but they overcharge a bit...
__________________
RC45 about the Z06:
|
It is also a cheaply made, fast to depreciate, badly service hunk of GM crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-06-2005, 10:25 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 69
|
1004.66 kbps
123.12 KB/s
im pleased with that as i have aol platinum 1mbit.
from jabba servers (im a fastrack member) i only get 80k/s whereas elsewhere i get 120k/s.....
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2005, 12:41 AM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
1065.08 kbps for the first one
2,748.99 Kbps for the second one, but they are both underratting me, im at 4mb in real life
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2005, 01:38 AM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada BC
Posts: 1,084
|
dslreports.com isn't ad either. They have a variety of tests you could run, and it tells you how to improve your connection and what not. Although I've never really noticed a difference after doing what it recommends.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
