Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2006, 06:04 PM   #1
mv
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
Default SSC Ultimate Aero Twin Turbo - 1180hp

Not sure whether I have included (or updated when I heard about this one half a year ago) this into my former "ultimate cars of the future" crystal ball where most of you wouldn´t believe and say the horsepower figures are ridiculous and unreal but it is here.

Press release : http://www.sscautos.com/multimedia/pr-20060810.pdf

SSC Ultimate Aero TT

Engine
Type: Aluminium Block and Heads (V-8)
Displacement: 387.2 cu.in.
Bore x Stroke: 4.125 x 3.620"
Compression Ratio: 8.975:1
Horsepower: 1180 bhp @ 6950 rpm
Torque: 961 lb./ft. @ 6150 rpm
Redline: 7200 rpm
Fuel Injection: Electronic Sequential Port
Weight: 422 lbs
Oil: SAE 5W/30 Fully Synthetic Racing
Induction System: Sequential, multi-port fuel injection. Twin Turbo Charger with cab adjustable boost pressure. 6 psi, 15 psi, 26 psi. Dual-forced air innercoolers
Fuel: Premium Unleaded - 92 Pump Octane

The Dynamics of the Aero
Coefficient of drag (Cd): 0.357
Frontal Area: 19.0 square feet
Belly pan: Complete flat belly pan with rear Venturi tunnels.

General Data
Dry Weight: 2,750 lbs.
Weight to Horsepower Ratio (lbs/hp): 2.33 New production record!
Weight distribution F/R:
Front: 42%
Rear: 58%
Wheel Base: 105.2"
Length: 176.2"
Width: 82.7"
Height: 43.0"
Ground Clearance: 4.0"
Trunk Space: 2.6 cu. ft.


0 to 60 mph: 2.78 seconds
1/4 mile: 9.90 seconds at 144 mph
Skidpad: 1.05 g
60 mph to 0 (braking): 103 feet

Gear Ratio RPM MPH
1st 3.82:1 7200 44.65
2nd 2.15:1 7200 79.28
3rd 1.56:1 7200 109.27
4th 1.212:1 7200 140.63
5th 0.973:1 7200 175.19
6th 0.656:1 7200 273.75
Final Drive Ratio: 3.44:1
Engine RPM @ 60 Top Gear: 1550


And believe it or not. A 1500hp version is set to come.
__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
mv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2006, 06:18 PM   #2
carguy_88
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 137
Default

pics?
carguy_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2006, 06:55 PM   #3
TeflonTron
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South East Thames
Posts: 618
Default

What does it weigh, as you have it down as 422lbs?!
TeflonTron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2006, 09:24 PM   #4
McLaren4eVa
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 510
Default

^^^^ I think 422lbs is the wieght of the engine. It is a light car previous versions were around the 1 tonne mark. would 1500BHP be legal. 1500BHP in a 1 tonne car thata power to weight ration of 1500BHP per tonne thats formula one territory.
__________________
McLaren4eVa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2006, 10:15 PM   #5
TeflonTron
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South East Thames
Posts: 618
Default

^ Yeah, that sounds about right, and that kind of power in that kind of car would make it crazy fast!
TeflonTron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2006, 10:26 PM   #6
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

but it's so ugly.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2006, 10:40 PM   #7
racer_f50
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,537
Default

ugliness may be the price payed for going over 270mph with stability.

if that thing comes to production i'll be very impressed, but i'm hopeful as I'd love to see some reviews of it
racer_f50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2006, 10:53 PM   #8
nickthaskater
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,056
Default

I like the look of it, though I've heard from people who have seen it up close in person that the quality is on the poor side.
__________________
nickthaskater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 12:19 AM   #9
jorge
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Puebla
Posts: 1,660
Default



1500 hp???? :shock:
__________________
jorge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 12:57 AM   #10
gobs3z
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,590
Default

Originally Posted by nickthaskater
I like the look of it, though I've heard from people who have seen it up close in person that the quality is on the poor side.
The last thing i'de want is poor quality at 270mph. "oops, there goes my mirror"
__________________

"If we could read the secret histories of our enemies, we would find in each story enough sorrow and suffering to disarm all hostility." Longfellow
gobs3z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 12:59 AM   #11
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by gobs3z
Originally Posted by nickthaskater
I like the look of it, though I've heard from people who have seen it up close in person that the quality is on the poor side.
The last thing i'de want is poor quality at 270mph. "oops, there goes my mirror"
That's the least of the problem when you're goint 270mph. "oops, there goes my brakes, and my tires, my windshield, and the back half."
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 02:25 AM   #12
crazidude
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada BC
Posts: 1,084
Default

Geez, the 1180hp one already had over 950lb/ft of torque. With the 1500hp one, having tires would be useless, you'd need something like tracks for a tank.
crazidude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 03:32 AM   #13
thepest
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The oldest continent
Posts: 751
Default

Originally Posted by HeilSvenska
but it's so ugly.
how could this weigh 420 lbs??
__________________

Always outnumbered, never outguned!!!
thepest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 05:55 AM   #14
gucom
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rotterdam, Holland, EU
Posts: 3,767
Default

as was already said, the engine's 420 lbs
__________________
gucom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 06:45 AM   #15
mv
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
Default

The post has been edited, now it´s probably clear how much the car weighs in at.

The first Aeros were of very poor quality. But it is getting better with every version they unleash.

The former 1050hp supercharged version was tested in Road and Track and they were actually impressed.

"Just when you thought the supercar war was over, out of nowhere come two potentially Veyron-whopping cars from an American company called SSC.

The Ultimate Aero averaged an impressive 73.1 mph besting the former Road & Track slalom record holding Ferrari Enzo by 0.1 mph" -- Road & Track magazine
__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
mv is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump