Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > General Discussion > Motorsport News And Discussion



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2004, 10:56 AM   #1
Ford Capri 2.8i
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Basque Country
Posts: 1,459
Default Is the replacement of Pizzonia instead of Gene a good choice

What do people think about the choise of Antonio Pizzonia as a second driver of Williams instead of Marc Gene, once it seems that the performances of Marc seems not too good for the Williams stuff, and they decided to get Pizzonia as long as Ralf Schumacher is not able to drive for the Formula 1?

In my opinion, Antonio is slower than Marc on the race, and qualifying as well..........and when challenging, i see Antonio more likely to finish off the road due to a drivers failure than Marc. In addition, i see Marc much better when setting a car up

Thats my opinion....see what you think about the replacement
Ford Capri 2.8i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2004, 11:19 AM   #2
mindgam3
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
Default

http://www.motorworld.net/forum/show...er=asc&start=0

Should be discussed in news and rumours where the pizzonia news was first made (I assume)

My opinion: Gene hasn't performed, Pizzonia has shown greater potential. He's the obvious choice out of the two
mindgam3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2004, 06:21 PM   #3
3D_CARD
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 141
Default

None of them are good choice -- althought Eddie Jordan is an ass, but Hiedfield worths more than 3 millions to Williams at this difficult time, and no doubt he's well deserved for that Willimas 2005 seat too.

Now even Mark in not in Williams's scope, what the hell has happened to Williams this year?
__________________
Ferrari Nuts!
3D_CARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2004, 12:41 PM   #4
davidoff
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20
Default

I think the best choice is Gene not only because he is the man with more km of the team , he has also been very professional working for the team for 2 years noly testing and not complaining because he doesn`t race.
davidoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2004, 02:34 PM   #5
caugb
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brazil
Posts: 68
Default

Testing is completely different from racing. Times in tests (like Barcelona recently) means nothing. No pressure. No big names braking next to you. I prefer Pizzonia, but the first race was also deceiving. Bad time (1st pressure session), average race (some off road trips). He is not worse than Gené, but not that better.
__________________
caugb
caugb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2004, 09:26 PM   #6
chipanggo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Philippines
Posts: 336
Default

pizzonia failed to impress in his first outing in the williams. let us wait and see his performance in the next gp before we make any conclusions. in hindsight, ej should have let heidfeld drive the williams.
chipanggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2004, 10:10 AM   #7
3D_CARD
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 141
Default

Pizzonia is slow too -- Only "quick Nick" is capable atm.
__________________
Ferrari Nuts!
3D_CARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump