Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-22-2008, 09:36 PM   #1
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default Edmunds GTR- numbers alot slower, lots of quality issues

With all of the hubbub surrounding the recent repairs on our long term 2009 Nissan GT-R we thought we'd bring things back around and focus on the point of the GT-R: going fast.

We ran our GT-R (our car purchased from a dealership, not a press vehicle) through all of our normal performance tests, 0-60, 1/4-mile, 60-0, slalom and skidpad.


2009 Nissan GT-R Performance Test:
Acceleration:

0-30: 1.5
0-45: 2.6
0-60: 3.9
0-60 with rollout ( read our How We Test article for more on rollout): 3.5
0-75: 5.5
1/4-mile: 12.0 @ 114.7

Comments: "Seems like both the driver and the car are working properly, but this isn't as quick as we've seen in the past. Launch is good, but 60 and 1/4 (times) are off slightly. Got noticeably slower the more we ran it. Quit at 4 runs."

Braking:

60-0: 108 feet
30-0: 28 feet

Comments: "Again, everything feels to spec, yet 108 is a long way from previous 98 ft best."

Slalom: 73.6 mph

Comments: "Suddenly the GT-R feels 400-lbs lighter in the slalom. The biggest challenge is not hitting cones (especially on the driver's right side). Discovered a counter intuitive trait this time: if it understeers, wood the throttle and let the computers take care of it."

Skidpad: .91 G

Comments: "All setting on full attack but it understeered its way to a .91G. Seems "off" to me."

Just to save you the time here are the links to our last GT-R test and one to the last test of a Corvette Z06 (which happened to be stonking fast and the quickest one we've ever tested - 1/4 Mile in 11.7 @ 123.2).

Oh, about that 27.4 mpg thing. On the same day as this test I was charged with escorting a test car, ferried by trailer, on a 250+ mile trek. We were limited to Trucks with Trailer speed limits (which were occasionally ignored by my right foot) on California's 5 highway. The digital display read 29.5, but our calculations had it a bit lower; 27.4. Beats my best Z06 mileage (25.5) by a hair.

Mike Magrath, Vehicle Testing Assistant @ 5,000 miles
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests/2...4mpg.html#more
and
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests/V...09-nissan-gtr/
which mentions a failed transaxle and a fuel system issue.
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 11:46 PM   #2
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

Those numbers seems about right
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2008, 04:08 AM   #3
styla21
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,744
Default

Aghh, that's more like it.
__________________
styla21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump