Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > General Discussion > Motorsport News And Discussion



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2004, 01:22 PM   #1
TopGearNL
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
Default Big Problem

You have all read the topic about Jaguar pulling out of formula 1
http://www.motorworld.net/forum/showthread.php?t=16998

But there is something else also explained in that topic and that is that Cosworth is for sale or may quit Formula 1 aswell.

That should mean that Jordan and Minardi won't have engines or a enginesupplier for next year and that could also be the end of these teams.

The only solution I see for those teams that is Cosworth does quit is look for an different engine, a Honda engine or a Mercedes, but then again these are very expensive ideas and these teams (Jordan and Minardi) do have a budget, if you know what I mean :x

What now? Will we see 3 teams leaving Formula 1, I certainly hope not
TopGearNL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 01:46 PM   #2
Ghostbat
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
Default

Does it really matter if Jordan and Minardi leaves the F1 circus? Just fewer backmarkers to lap for the other teams“.
Ghostbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 02:10 PM   #3
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

if those two leave there will be a lot less chances for the younger drivers to start their F1 careers. most of the rookie drivers start off with the small private teams.
So with the loss of Jordan and Minardi, i think we would pretty much see the lineups frozen until contracts start expiring. The only affordable way i see those two getting new engines is by going with the Renault enigine. i don't know how affordable Fiat would make their engine to wither of those teams, but since Sauber are running them i don;t think it would be that horrible.

And i don't want to start seeing suggestions of having one engine supplier for all teams the way CART/IRL does it. If a team can't build a reliable engine *cough*mercedes*cough* don't make someone else bail them out. Yeah that might shut ron dennis up but you're going to have alot more teams speaking up and complaining.
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 07:09 PM   #4
Toronto
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,252
Default

toyota is the answer, they have been heard wanting to sell their engines.
__________________
Toronto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2004, 08:43 PM   #5
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

hmmm...mid-grid engine powering back of the grid cars? i like that idea. after all, we do have a front of the grid engine in a set of mid grid cars already, that could make things really interesting.
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 01:31 AM   #6
stracing
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,901
Default

f1 does need those teams, look where webber, fischella, alonso came from

it will be a huge loss if they left
__________________
Two rules for life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
stracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 03:02 AM   #7
aks
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 566
Default

i say get Lamborghini into F1, that would be interesting!!
__________________

My Car: Alfa Romeo 147 2.0 Selespeed 5-Door (Black Exterior/Red Leather Interior/Sunroof/17 inch Alloys/Tinted Windows/Rear Parking Sensors)
aks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 09:46 AM   #8
TransAm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 2,766
Default

Originally Posted by aks
i say get Lamborghini into F1, that would be interesting!!

Yeah man! Do any of our resident Lambo experts know why they don't compete in F1 already?
__________________
Current: 2008 BMW 118d SE, 2002 Honda S2000, 2007 Honda CBR600RR

Previous: 2003 Z4 3.0i SMG, 1995 Aprilia RS250
TransAm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 10:13 AM   #9
stracing
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,901
Default

thats upto vw to decide, last i read they didn't want to spend the money
__________________
Two rules for life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
stracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 10:59 AM   #10
possessed_beaver
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lat: -31 56.84 505 Long. 116.00.09 5 Australia
Posts: 2,855
Default

there is a clause in the concorde agreement, that says if it drops below "x" teams the remaning teams will run 3 F1 cars each...

imagine how much a ferrari 1,2,3 finish would suck!
possessed_beaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 12:42 PM   #11
Toronto
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,252
Default

Originally Posted by TransAm2001
Originally Posted by aks
i say get Lamborghini into F1, that would be interesting!!

Yeah man! Do any of our resident Lambo experts know why they don't compete in F1 already?
they did, and they were a laugh, thats why they stay away from racing.

SEAT might be the best chance for VW to get into F1
__________________
Toronto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 02:13 PM   #12
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

i was thinking mabey lotus could get back into F1... backed by GM... GM already shows some amazing race know how in the ALMS, and european GT tours...
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 03:06 PM   #13
mindgam3
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
Default

i think there a lot of companies that are "could be's" for F1 but i dont think anyone wants to get into F1 when ferrari are so dominant at the moment and the chances of them getting to the top aren't that great - see jaguars performance and toyota, the biggest car company in the world, even they cant do much to even get up with BAR, McLaren, Williams or even sauber for that matter. Although ford hardly gave them a chance considering they were only around for a few years, and webber proved by having a good driver that he is, they were improving all the time.
mindgam3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 03:28 PM   #14
Toronto
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,252
Default

toyota is the 2nd biggest car company in terms of sales, GM has been #1 for 70+ plust years
__________________
Toronto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2004, 04:18 PM   #15
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

i don't think GM is cut out for the demands of F1. Yeah the engines they run in NASCAR and CART have shown alot of reliability, but just because an engine can spin at high revs for sustained amounts of time, doesn't mean they can go up and down in their ranges the way an F1 car can. If you think about it, F1 tracks like Monaco are as close to stop and go driving as you can get, unlike CART and NASCAR which run on oval tracks for 500miles, its all freeway

For GM to make the jump, i think they will have divert too much of their motorsport budget to be able to run factory entries in any other type of racing.
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump