Originally Posted by 10000rpmlover
as I said before, the one thing I disliked about quantum of solace (which is based on a real short story by Ian Flemming) was the fact that this is not the Bond we are used to, this Bond is rough, flawed, which is fine, but what they are missing is the gadgets, sure he had the cellphone to end all cellphones, this cell could take explosions, water, getting shot at, sand and it still worked... son of a bitch I want that cellphone, but nothing else, not even a lockpick, the car is now just that, the car and even though is absolutely nice, during that chase scene a little bit of smoke or an oil slick would have been kinda cool
I did feel sorry about "Fields" such a cutie, why is it that no one wants to bang that other girl? not even mark wahlberg wanted that poontang in max payne, does she stink? WTF?
|
I don't know. I do like watching Roger Moore Bond films, but I would never say those were good movies. They were too silly. Remember the Casio fax watch in Spy Who Loved Me? Or the submersible Lotus, for that matter?
I think it's time for Q to come back though. Q in Casino Royale or Quantum of Solace would've been a distraction. Especially since Bond wasn't even at MI6 at any point in those movies. But since the next movie will, presumably, have M and Bond flushing out rest of "Quantum", I can see Q outfitting Bond with crazy scifi, yet somehow plausible gadgets for his missions. I did hope though, during Quantum of Solace, that someone would break those crazy MI6 projection glass walls by accident, so that they'd have to call Q up to where M was.
