06-17-2005, 02:08 PM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,668
|
Originally Posted by 1zippo1
Originally Posted by Just_me
Originally Posted by |Nuno|
Hmm... Good show by the M6 on a straight line and on braking, and not a bad time round Hockenheim.
But something was definitely wrong with that Gallardo. There's no way it only clocks 15.4 seconds from 0-200 Km/h and 4.4 to 100... Hell, all the acceleration measures are suspiciously slow. And the same goes for the Viper.
|
Last time Sportauto drove Gallardo the time was 13.0 sec
Anyway, these cars were tested during the same day under the same conditions, which is good when you want to compare cars.
For that price, M6 offer a lot of performance, bring on M6 CSL
|
Same conditions ok, but that's too much difference. And there's no way the M6 clocks a 12.8sec in soaking wet conditions. The Gallardo has AWD => better traction in wet conditions if that should be the reason for the big difference. Probably just something wrong with the car because I allways thought SportAuto was pretty objective (small remark though: bmw's allways do very well, just look at the M3 CSL times)
Still, a nice read and figures are only a part of the story. Thx!
|
|
|
|