|
Originally Posted by dannyroz
Umm isnt F1 all about change?
|
Changing cars - not venues.
That would be like having Wimledon Open at a new locaiton each year.
|
Originally Posted by dannyroz
Considering there have been 3-4 new tracks in the last couple of years (estimating so dont go after me), not to mention more races each and every year...it becomes unfair to other countries who only have 1 GP.
|
Unfair? What has fair got to do with it?
Do you think Max and Bernie are motivated by fair? They are motivated by money. The FIA is motivated by Benries money.
|
Originally Posted by dannyroz
Because of that, they need to level the playing field and getting rid of San Marino and alternating German GPs is the only way to do it.
|
Why does any playing field have to be leveled?
What a load of crock.
|
Originally Posted by dannyroz
As for Fuji, it was the original Japanese GP and it was felt that it should be left that way.
|
Except the layout s no closer to the original than Britney Speasr is still a virgin..
|
Originally Posted by dannyroz
|
If it changes, it is no longer F1
|
Considering your quote, F1 would still be running at the Nordschliefe, and Watkins Glen.
Now that I think about it, damn now I want them to bring back the Watkins Glen race :roll: |
How about they just change every venue - lose Monaco and then just races in the Middle East and China ...
