Originally Posted by nthfinity
Which, of course you are wrong, as I put a minimum velocity to indicate 1/4 mile per second. Which, I am right. But any fool can see that.
|
A fool can. A smarter person can see a different thing.
What I posted was "My 338 does quarter mile in less than a second", which is true. That means I'm not wrong. And so, due to the boolean nature of right and wrong, it happens to mean that I am right.
Don't dodge the point, you're not a viper. I've said that the .338 is faster and more practical than dragsters. Which is true. As anyone with at least one eye can check, I didn't say a world about the MV needed to have a sub-second quarter mile. You did, and you made an assumption that .338 doesn't reach 1320 fps. Sadly (for targets) - or fortunately (for shooters) - it flies much faster than 1320 fps.
Now, I never said you were wrong, until now, when you actually are: as seen above, I'm right, and you've mistakenly stated that I'm not.
Whoa, somebody doesn't know about the effect of repetitive wear on cylinder walls,
|
He does.
They still last.
And they're still light.
stronger materials equates to reduced quality control,
|
Now, this is simply not true.
I don't even mention that tuners work on the original block out of the original material.
[You do realize that the ls family of engines, despite being larger in deplacement by 2 liters then the similar bmw engine, is lighter by almost 100 lbs.
|
Good point. I do. However, it's not the case: the Jap low-displacement engines are still far lighter than the USian big blocks.