|
Originally Posted by RAMMIUS
|
your posts prove you are as incompetant
|
Really, well what I`ve said here
http://www.motorworld.net/forum/show...r=asc&start=20
in 2 reply`s was the same with Mr. graywolf`s reply in this topic, so graywolf 624 is incompetent too ?
I say ban him.
All in favor say "yay" all opposing say "yay"
|
That`s because `ive corrected your replies a few times in the past and somehow you didn`t like that.
|
Rammius he asked a simple question what the fucks ur problem
|
He read the thread about the Black Enzo crash and he insulted me directly by saying that i`am talking out of my ass, about Enzo`s chassis design, that brakes in 2 in case of accident.
If i remember correctly, and I do I was the only one to sustain that it was designed to brake apart apart in order to protect.
My insult was a result of his action, but then nth felt that it was necesarry to insult me, don`t know the reason.
Maybe he didn`t read the thread about the Enzo crash, maybe he didn`t make the connection about the first reply in this topic and whom it was adressed to. don`t know and it doesnt matter. |
Actually, it does matter. You are attacking somebody again and again w/out provocation. You take simple questions, and opinions as a personal attack against you for some reason.. yet you prove you don't know any more then the next JW member... I would argue a great deal of members here know more then you. I for one designed a carbon fibre reinforced aluminum monicoque in 2003 at WMU; so I think that qualifies me as something more then the accused "wanabe" What chassis have you designed? What technical papers have you even read?
am I insulting when I say that you prove you are incompetant? refer to many of your posts. They in fact, do prove you are nothing more then a very angry fanboy. I hope you never sit in a Ferrari, as the Ferrari would shudder from your aura of idiocracy. I will defend another JW member when I feel he is being wronged, and this is ANOTHER case of you doing just that, and others defending the guy you call "Dipshit", or other derogotory remarks.
Also, You still haven't mentioned "what i said at Fchat" have you, incompetant asshole fanboy? I'm curious as to what kind of comment you can constrew as being deserving of your idiocratic wrath. LOL
|
Originally Posted by RAMMIUS
|
Originally Posted by ViperASR
I think the design of the car was great, if not close to perfect. It just seems that the if the car is T-boned or something like that happens, it splits in the middle. Perhaps it is the result of the carbon-fibre, in that is does not bend like steel/aluminum, it shatters.
|
You stupid imbecil :x , that chassis was designed in order to brake apart in case the impact passes some value.
In that case not only the passangers have a better chance of surviving but also some idiot like you that comes from the other direction doesn`t get hit by 1350kg but rather by half, and improving the chances of survival for everybody , you dipshit.
The same company that makes the chassis for Enzo made the one for Carrera GT(and for Veyron too), and when that lady crashed the Black GT the car split in two also.
How come a moron like you, somehow finds flaws in the worlds best cars ? :alienflip: |
How come you can't find flaws in a Ferrari... or other hyper exotics for that matter, you are living in a dream world. There is a school of thought in Engineering that states something to the nature of this... "Learn to expect the unexpected in real world testing" The splitting action of the Enzo is an example of this.. Bare in mind, not one of the crash tested Enzo's had split like this.
Even another step beyond this, Why the hell are you attacking so many people again and again. You are an asshole, incompetant, and an over-the-top fanboy; nothing more.
|
Originally Posted by bmuller
Don't worry about RAMMIUS chico, he just seems a little more touchy than usual. Plus, you didn't do anything so we're on your side.
BTW, welcome to JW. It's always nice to see new faces/avatars...  |
I would argue he is just as touchy as always, and I may be able to argue quite successfully.