|
Originally Posted by bultaco_metralla
Ferrari had the better car from 2000 to 2005, and nobody thinks schumacher won cause had the better car... everybody was talking about that ferrari will won in Montmelo,and finally alonso got 18 seconds over.....dude!!!
|
in 2000 Ferrari didn't have the best car, it was very competitive... That year Schu had a couple of DNF, as well a Mika... it was a great season.
what happened to Mika in 2001, is pretty much what happened to Kimi last year.
|
Originally Posted by bultaco_metralla
so to this:
|
Originally Posted by bmagni
Conclusion, he has been benefited by the other teams lack of pace, same thing as the past year... Alonso doesn't win races, the other teams loose them  |
Ferrari had won all last years because the other lost races... or what??? Think before write dude!! |
remember Spain 2001 ?
To me Alonso hasn't proven to be the outstanding driver everyone says he is, he hasn't won races like today, when there isn't a clear advantage for him, when the competitive cars are equaly good... he has won having the best car, not being the best driver...
is he good ? yeah, but thats it...