View Single Post
Old 11-18-2008, 05:45 AM   #21
ae86_16v
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
Default

Originally Posted by a007apl View Post
I'm see the movie last weekend, much more action of the first (cassino Royale), but the story not good.
Exactly, almost too much action if there's such a thing. I enjoyed it, but I think overall Casino Royale was a better story. It almost seems like there was so much action in this one that it didn't give it enough time to develop.

Originally Posted by 5vz-fe View Post
As much as I don't think Daniel Craig is not suitable to play bond, it look nonetheless very entertaining.
Originally Posted by pagani View Post
I have just seen it and it think it's a very boring movie worst bond movie of all times.
And i dit not like it at all they have remove everything that makes bond fun.
Danial craig is way to serious to play bond they need more funnier actor.
They could have used the aston more
I think he is probably the best Bond in years. Definitely very serious tone which is good. The older Bonds have gotten so goofy that it is a spoof on itself, like Philip said. Which is kind of sad.

They definitely set the series back on track with these two films, but nevertheless, Casino Royale was a better movie over all.

Definitely Recommended!
ae86_16v is offline   Reply With Quote