Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net - View Single Post

bmwfreak · 02-24-2004, 01:07 PM

*tsk tsk tsk* Ferrari's ethics here are plain to see. Win at all costs, even if the costs are : sportmanship, fairness etc, where the ends supposedly justify the means.

There was Austria 2002, Indy 2002, the tyre row with Michelin. Not to mention Malaysia 1999 (When Ferrari used a whole plane of Milan lawyers to convince a judge that trained engineers couldnt tell 1 mm from 5 - the barge boards saga).

the last incident prompted Ron Dennis to say "Moving aero surfaces are illegal, except when they're on a Ferrari."

The Sauber look slike a repainted F2003-GA. Alot of ppl, if nto everyone, seems to agree on this. Of ocurse, due to the already simliar designs that both teams use, it would be hard to really tell any differences. This will always be the case, unless someone tries to ape the FW26, and we find out that BAR is actually the second team of Williams. Hehehe.

02-24-2004, 01:07 PM	#12
bmwfreak Regular User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Kuching, Malaysia. Posts: 345	tsk tsk tsk Ferrari's ethics here are plain to see. Win at all costs, even if the costs are : sportmanship, fairness etc, where the ends supposedly justify the means. There was Austria 2002, Indy 2002, the tyre row with Michelin. Not to mention Malaysia 1999 (When Ferrari used a whole plane of Milan lawyers to convince a judge that trained engineers couldnt tell 1 mm from 5 - the barge boards saga). the last incident prompted Ron Dennis to say "Moving aero surfaces are illegal, except when they're on a Ferrari." The Sauber look slike a repainted F2003-GA. Alot of ppl, if nto everyone, seems to agree on this. Of ocurse, due to the already simliar designs that both teams use, it would be hard to really tell any differences. This will always be the case, unless someone tries to ape the FW26, and we find out that BAR is actually the second team of Williams. Hehehe. __________________ ^Home. ///M God's gift to the driver.