View Single Post
Old 02-11-2007, 06:41 PM   #64
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default

a very simmilar engine is used in the global hawk ..
http://911review.org/Sept11Wiki/GlobalHawk.shtml
Yes but its 3/4 of that size and the article I posted has a man from rolls indiana where the global hawk is made saying the part matches nothing out of his plant.
The 757 is made in the UK by a different division of the company.

why is there no sing of wings or tail section ....
these parts survive because they are torn away ..
757 is a big aircraft .. the rubble seems small
why is the hole in the building soo small ...
Go back and look at the picture of the tehran accident i posted or the plane into the cement wall from popular mechanics. In neither case do you see any sign of the wings and tail section. They disintegrated on impact. Your talking an item full of jet fuel and made of mostly aluminum and fiberglass hitting a bunker. Not much is going to be left of the plane.

you saw how the planes penetrated the towers ... the fuselarge and 'wings' penetrated the building .. the case is not the same in the pentagon crash ...
The similarities in construction of the two are not even close. One is a solid cement wall a few stories tall with fortefied walls and blast windows designed to resist external explosions.
The second is a 110 story building designed around a steel beam frame. It wasn't designed to withstand a hit from anything. It was just meant to support its weight. One, the pentagon, was just further reinfoced through renovation. The other has 30 year old fire proofing and steel beams.

A fast moving object hits a t shaped object at the cross of the t versus hitting the center of a staight wall. Its an entirely different concept.
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote