[SPEEDKILLAR]

Originally Posted by bmuller Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR Originally Posted by nthfinity Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR You mean the puny burns, I could do more damage with a candlestick, common man, fire-resistant or not, the heat of kerosine burning would have scorched the area. And yeah, partially desintegrate, but not completly, there are a lot of components that aren't made of aluminium, where are those? That it wouldn't retain its shape on impact isn't science, let's say the nose and the rest of the airplane pierced the walls, then the surrounding walls should have been strong enough to brake of the wings, so that in theory the wings don't enter the building, well, I can't see no pics that show me twisted, shredded aluminium, and don't forget the huge engines? And again, don't forget the fuel contained in the wings. What was knocked down? Nothing really. Not really a good anwer for the camera's he? What's wrong with showing these video's, if I had a relative who died in there, I would rather ask the gouvernment to release them to stop these so called conspiracy theories and to see what happend for myself. I don't think they hid them, they just had to make the "sacrifice for the greater good I guess". I see that you aren't objective, you are too emotional about this, wich is understandable. But I know that you aren't 100% sure about this, and you just take the easy way out of this, because you are afraid you'll see that the USA aren't as free as they thought they are. That's all I have to say about this. Always quick to judge, and always last to perform research. Spoken like a true biggot faciest. You have no clue what freedoms we enjoy here http://www.911-strike.com/missing-confetti.htm nuff said, now lets hear you try to disprove any of that You really expect me to read something that was most likely made by a fascist or maybe a nerdy redneck :arrow: And it seems you only have problems with my opinion, when there are clearly other members sharing the same opinion, common kiddo, give it up already, I'm not in the mood for these games. Redneck you say...? Now I know you're just pulling stuff out of your a**. You really expect people to believe that a "redneck" is capable of designing and conducting such an elaborate experiment? Plus, since you never even read the article, how can you even begin to pass your own high and mighty judgement on the results, but of course you don't even know what the results of the test were because you didn't read the article? Fascists too...? Let's pretend for one second that the U.S. gov't is in fact as you claim "fascist". I can understand how this might influence any typed/printed report, but the fact that they have supplied pictures, which clearly support their given conclusions, is hard to deny. But then again, even though you never read or looked at the article, apparently you already knew that too... Plus, what's your deal with calling everyone some name akin to "common man/kiddo/etc." Since when did you receive any sort of authority to pass judgement on anyone else? And games, what games? You post arguments in support of your opinion and they are of course "factual", but when someone else posts evidence that supports their side of the argument, they're just playing games. Not only that, you don't even have the gusto to review their side of the argument for fear that it might prove you wrong, you just dismiss it as being wrong and biased, did I hear someone say redneck...? That's like trying to win an argument with a 3 year old; you present him with hard evidence and his response is; "No, you're wrong and I'm right." Then when you ask how he knows he is right, he simply says "Because I'm right...". Needless to say, anyone who adopts this type of strategy in an argument obviously knows he's been defeated because if he had more definitive evidence, he would have presented it to disprove the opposing view. Strikingly similar to the 3 year old, if you actually had substantive evidence disproving the opposition's, you would have presented it. Thus, your argument has been defeated. ***Sidenote*** This is not a personal attack by any means, as I have nothing against you. However, next time you decide to present yourself as any sort of authority, use a more convincing argument and maybe we'll believe you, until then... :bye: Cheers

I didn't read everything you typed, just the redneck stuff, that is why I typed, "nerdy redneck"





Anyway, you have your opinion, and I have mine, let's leave it at that.