View Single Post
Old 02-08-2007, 04:49 PM   #12
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR

You mean the puny burns, I could do more damage with a candlestick, common man, fire-resistant or not, the heat of kerosine burning would have scorched the area.

And yeah, partially desintegrate, but not completly, there are a lot of components that aren't made of aluminium, where are those?


That it wouldn't retain its shape on impact isn't science, let's say the nose and the rest of the airplane pierced the walls, then the surrounding walls should have been strong enough to brake of the wings, so that in theory the wings don't enter the building, well, I can't see no pics that show me twisted, shredded aluminium, and don't forget the huge engines? And again, don't forget the fuel contained in the wings.


What was knocked down? Nothing really.


Not really a good anwer for the camera's he? What's wrong with showing these video's, if I had a relative who died in there, I would rather ask the gouvernment to release them to stop these so called conspiracy theories and to see what happend for myself.


I don't think they hid them, they just had to make the "sacrifice for the greater good I guess".

I see that you aren't objective, you are too emotional about this, wich is understandable. But I know that you aren't 100% sure about this, and you just take the easy way out of this, because you are afraid you'll see that the USA aren't as free as they thought they are.



That's all I have to say about this.
Always quick to judge, and always last to perform research. Spoken like a true biggot faciest. You have no clue what freedoms we enjoy here

http://www.911-strike.com/missing-confetti.htm

nuff said, now lets hear you try to disprove any of that
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote