|
Originally Posted by ViperASR
fuel-causes fire, hence the burns on the side of the building, and that is probobly part of the reason that the roof collapsed the way it did. Again, the pentagon was designed to get hit with bombs and such, therefore, it would be pretty damn fire resistant.
debris-take a good look on the interenet, there are plenty of pictures of debirs, however, like I said, alot of the plane would have desintegrated on impact as it was hauling ass into something that was really really strong
size-again, the plane would not hold its shap on impact, idk if you have ever been around planes, but they are not the stongest thing in the world as they are made from aluminum. People seem to want to see an aircraft shaped hole in the middle on the pentagon, aint gonna happen, the walls of the pentagon are merely too stong to take a hit from a plane and show that kind of damage
surrounding areas-there are all kind things knocked over on the way to the building, again, take a look on the interenet and you will find videos and such of an exact path the plane took once it came close to the ground
cameras-eh, who knows, but maybe the government dosnt 1: want to release the locations of all the security cameras, 2: want to release something showing hundreds of people dying, for fear of families suing or fear of upsetting them. There was nothing they could do about the WTC videos as everyone had them damn near instantly
Stuff like this is clearly biased, and only tells part of the story. And it really pisses me off when people do this stuff :x , because hundreds of people on a plane died that day, leaving behind families (KIDS!). My family knows someone who lost their son, (something like 13 years old, he was on his way to see his grandparents) are you saying that he really didnt die that day? And that the government is hiding him somewhere for the rest of his life? Hey, maybe the plane landed in mexico somewhere. There were alot of people that died that day, and doing this is no way to respect them or their families.
|
You mean the puny burns, I could do more damage with a candlestick, common man, fire-resistant or not, the heat of kerosine burning would have scorched the area.
And yeah, partially desintegrate, but not completly, there are a lot of components that aren't made of aluminium, where are those?
That it wouldn't retain its shape on impact isn't science, let's say the nose and the rest of the airplane pierced the walls, then the surrounding walls should have been strong enough to brake of the wings, so that in theory the wings don't enter the building, well, I can't see no pics that show me twisted, shredded aluminium, and don't forget the huge engines? And again, don't forget the fuel contained in the wings.
What was knocked down? Nothing really.
Not really a good anwer for the camera's he? What's wrong with showing these video's, if I had a relative who died in there, I would rather ask the gouvernment to release them to stop these so called conspiracy theories and to see what happend for myself.
I don't think they hid them, they just had to make the "sacrifice for the greater good I guess".
I see that you aren't objective, you are too emotional about this, wich is understandable. But I know that you aren't 100% sure about this, and you just take the easy way out of this, because you are afraid you'll see that the USA aren't as free as they thought they are.
That's all I have to say about this.