View Single Post
Old 02-12-2005, 11:52 AM   #10
mindgam3
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
Default

Originally Posted by Ghostbat
Originally Posted by mindgam3
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
Originally Posted by mindgam3
Kinda pointless having a 612hp beast that you can't put the power down in whether wet or dry
IMO 0-100km/h in 4.3sec is "putting the power down".
For a 612bhp car? Not really.... maybe for motorway crusing and overtaking all the torque and power is handy, but for a sportscar, its near useless, and as EVO states... the SL55 AMG is definately the better car to go for. Especially 0-60 is only 4.7 for the 55 and is £50,000 cheaper, £50,000 more for unusable power is stupid in my view and anyone who buys one has not got any sense. Even more so when you consider the alternatives.... ferrari 575, AM vanquish, AM DB9 + track car, SL55 AMG + track car... ferrari 430 + track car... there's so many better options i really don't see the point of it to be honest
You crack me up dude. What you pretty much say is that the S65 isn't a fast car. Are you serious when you say that i.e the ferrari 430 and AM DB9 are alternatives to the S65? The point of this car is to be the fastest luxury saloon, the end! And guess what, it is. And forget about the money issue when you talk about this car. it's not meant to be a common car on the street.

Edit: maybe you confused it with the SL65?
shit :roll: lol, yes i did confuse it with the SL65, didnt read the subject properly... but still, it is £140k, and I don't see the point on spending that much on what is basically an S class with more power and twice the price tag..... very nearly as pointless as the SL65 but not quite
mindgam3 is offline   Reply With Quote