Lamborghini LM002...what was wrong?!
 

http://www.lamborghiniclub.nl/beelden/lm002.jpg
http://www.d-tajms.czweb.org/offroad/image/lm002-3.jpg
http://www.lamborghinistuff.com/medi...ales+sheet.jpg
http://www.autospecs.tripod.com/pics...i_lm002_04.jpg

I heard it had one of the highest fuel consumption...and it had the same

engine as the Diablo?! But what was really wrong with it?! :roll:

Everything.


Check out the rims :lol:

It had the sizes as the Hummer...maybe the consumption was really too much, but it

shouldn't be a surprise...Its a Lambo SUV...

Otherwise it could be a nice member for some collectors! :wink:

LM 002
 

Length 4900 mm / 196 in
Height 1850 mm / 74 in
Width 2000 mm / 80 in
Weight 2700 kgs / 5940 lbs
Front Track
Rear Track ? mm / ? in
? mm / ? in
Engine V12
Powertrain Layout Front mounted / 4WD
Power 444 bhp @ 6800 rpm
Torque ? Nm @ ? rpm
Gear Type 5 speed manual
Tire Sizes(Front)
Tire Sizes(Rear) 345/60VR15
345/60VR15
Top Speed 126 mph / 210 kph
0 - 60 mph 8.5 seconds

http://www.autospecs.tripod.com/pics...i_lm002_01.jpg
http://lamborghini.r2.ru/automobili/...2/lm002_02.jpg
http://lamborghini.r2.ru/automobili/...2/lm002_04.jpg

see the very eugonomical location for the gear leaver, aparantley it costs an absalute fuckload to fill!

It is ugly. On another note, right here in San Francisco, British Motors on Van Ness always have on parked in their show room. Even though their display models changes quite frequently it seems that the LM002 always stays.

IMO .... LM002 looke better then H2.... and prolly the fuel consumptions is less then the H2 ...... its simply better then H2 :!:

it had the engine from the countach, not the diablo...the diablo wasn't in production when the LM002 came out.

Why do you think something was wrong with it ? I saw one in Paris, it was astounding ! And the sound is those of a V12 really !!

Nothing is wrong with it , its absolutely gorgeous , maybe the best suv of all times , right up in the list with the cayenne and the Hummer

Wtf, you guys are serious, look how it looks, its probably not a real off-roader, IT SUCKS.

Wasn't it was designed for the military? If so, it is probably a pretty good off roader. The only problem was it's price.

A dog shed with wheels. :D :D

I'll phrase that differently, its probably not a decent off roader, and I don't think its only the price, how much does this thing wastes fuel, probably not such a good thing for the military. The Hummer is a diesel, remember.

quite the contrary...it guzzles premium, had a huge price, but was as capable as a Hummer off road. It is excellent on the rough stuff..and with that engine...I'd take it any day over a Hummer.