![]() |
Autocar 1993:McLaren F1 around Nürburgring
|
Nice. Anyone know what lap time it posted?
|
Thanks...Great article. :D
|
Quote:
|
fantastic article!! this is really the best car ever made!!
|
I think 7.35 is a bit optimistic. 7.45 is more like it.
|
Quote:
|
Okay, assuming that the speed posted on the map in the article is that from a lap by the F1 and using known data from the Porsche Carrera GT and the Pagani Zonda, let us compare the three cars
Circuit Pagani Porsche Mclaren Round time 7.44 min 7.40 min n/a Schwedenkreuz 260 Km/h 256 Km/h 274 Km/h Aremberg 95 Km/h (1,1g) 104 Km/h (1,25g) 89 Km/h Fuchsroehre 251 Km/h 240 Km/h 225 Km/h Metzgesfeld 213 Km/h 158 Km/h 241 Km/h Bergwerk 94 Km/h (1,1g) 106 Km/h (1,35g) 113 Km/h Kesselchen 236 Km/h 237 Km/h 241 Km/h Klostertal 1 170 Km/h (1,1g) 161 Km/h (1,15g) N/a Klostertal 2 81 Km/h (1,1g) 92 Km/h (1,2g) N/a Pflanzgarten 193 Km/h (0g) 191 Km/h (0g) 209 Km/h Galgenkopf 134 Km/h (1,1g) 135 Km/h (1,1g) 137 Km/h Doettinger Hoehe 280 Km/h 294 Km/h 322 Km/h So I think overall the McLaren would be faster than 7.40 considering that it whips the Carrera GT nearly everywhere ... Note: 1. I got the Carrera/Pagani speed and times from here http://www.track-challenge.com/main_e.asp 2. Some of the numbers in the track map posted above were little difficult to read - I would like a high res of just of the cirucit to make sure I got the Mclaren's numbers right 3. To figure out the other parts of the circuit mentioned in the above section that have not been coded in the circuit map, am attaching a more detailed pic of Nuerburgring http://www.denvic.dircon.co.uk/images/nurburm.jpg |
I don't think I can pronounce any of the corners :!:
|
Thank you for the article philios and thank you for these informations sameerrao :wink:
|
Quote:
Your conclusion that the F1 is faster is no suprise, but the speeds on that map may be the average figures or, if they were the F1's figures, i am sure the driver wasn't going flat out. :D Are we sure that nobody has figured an F1 at the 'Ring... it seems so strange that the ultimate road car hasn't gone to the ultimate circuit. :? |
The McLaren F1 isn't really fast around corners (Road and Track test 0,86 g), and it would never beat the Carrera GT, which is capable of 1,2+ g. So on the Nürburgring it would have been slower. Also the Zonda would be faster on the Nürburgring. On a track like Monza however it would be a different story.
|
Quote:
However, if you read the Evo article comparing the GT and the F1 (see the Magazine Scan section), they mentioned that the GT's suspension is very stiffly set up. Possibly this is why it cannot exploit all its performance on the Nurburgring which has got a lot of elevation changes, bumps and other stuff to tax a suspension. I mean it is barely a few seconds faster than the GT3-RS even though it has a lot more horsepower.... |
Quote:
|
I agree with Vansquish. As they emphasized in the article, the McLaren is set-up for road use and its not overly wide or stiffly sprung, which does mean it won't have the out-right cornering speeds of cars like the CGT with super-stiff suspension.
Another thing to consider is the multiple 'routes' around the Nurburgring. It seems there are about 3 or 4 different lengths for a 'lap', so its hard to tell which is which sometimes... Its really a shame that the track was wet and full of traffic, I'd really like to see what time the Macca could wring out, or even what speed it could hit on the back straight :twisted: Almost forgot, thanks, its always great to read about the F1! |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.